The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.

About this Item

Title
The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.
Author
Whitgift, John, 1530?-1604.
Publication
Printed at London :: By Henry Binneman, for Humfrey Toye,
Anno. 1574.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Cartwright, Thomas, 1535-1603. -- Replye to an answere made of M. Doctor Whitgifte -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Episcopacy -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 7, 2024.

Pages

T. C. Pag. 130. Sect. 2.

M. Doctor asketh howe it is proued that there was any examination of the communicantes. After this sorte, all things necessarie were vsee in the churches of God in the Apostles tymes, but

Page 592

examination of those, whose knowledge of the mysterie of the Gospel was not knowne or doubted of, was a necessary thing, therefore it was vsed in the churches of God whiche were in the Apo∣stles time.

Io. Whitgifte.

I denie your minor, fyrst, bycause no suche at that tyme woulde offer themselues to receyue the communion. Secondly, bicause if any such did offer themselues, not béeing knowne, the fault is particular to themselues, and toucheth them onely, not the whole Churche. Thirdly, bycause if it had bene so necessarie a thing, Saincte Paule woulde not haue omitted it, especially when he hadde an especiall cause to speake of it, as he had when he spake of priuate examination of a mannes selfe, 1. Cor. 11. Probet autem seipsum home. &c. Of the whiche wordes M. Caluin speaking in* 1.1 his booke agaynst the Anabaptists sayth thus: But what neede we so to dispute? seing the Apostle himselfe in an other place treating of the manner, howe euery man shoulde be prepared to the receyning of the Supper of the Lorde (as it behoueth him) doth not bidde euery one too examine the faultes of hys neighboure, but speaketh after thys manner, Probet seipsum bomo. &c. Lette a man examine himselfe, and so let him eate of this breade and drynke of this cuppe: for hee that cateth and drinketh vnworthily, eateth and drin∣keth his owne damnation. In whiche woordes there are two things to be obserued. Firste, that to communicat with those that are vnworthy, is not to eate the bread of the Lorde vn∣worthyly,* 1.2 but not to prepare himselfe as he ought to do, and not to expend and consider his owne faith and repentaunce. The second, that when the supper is to be receiued, we begin not with other men to examine them, but that we trie ourselues: and surely if all things were exactly considered, euen they which haue so much leysure to enquire of other mens beha∣uiour, are for the most part negligent, and forgetfull of their owne duties. So that it is ne∣cessary for euery man to examine himselfe, and not so necessary for one man to exa∣mine another. But what I thinke of this kynde of examining by other, I haue decla∣red in my Answer to the Admonition.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.