The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.

About this Item

Title
The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.
Author
Whitgift, John, 1530?-1604.
Publication
Printed at London :: By Henry Binneman, for Humfrey Toye,
Anno. 1574.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Cartwright, Thomas, 1535-1603. -- Replye to an answere made of M. Doctor Whitgifte -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Episcopacy -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 1, 2024.

Pages

Chap. 1. the. 14. Diuision.
T. C. Pag. 132. Sect. 1.

And further if this be a good reason, that therefore it is meete we should kneele at the supper for as much as we giue thanks, then it followeth that when soeuer we haue supped or dined, it is meete that we should kneele, whē as yet we do say grace sitting. And by this he accuseth our Sa∣uioure Christe, and his Apostles, as those whiche did not vse that which was most fit, for in his iudgement he saythe kneeling is the fittest site, or position of the body which can be, and if our Sa∣uioure Christ had bin of that iudgement, vndoubtedly he would haue also kneeled, and caused hys Apostles so to do.

Io. Whitgifte.

I do not speake of euery priuate mans gesture in euery priuate place. I knowe that a man may also pray sitting, lying, standing, walking and riding. I speake of the publike gesture most méete to be vsed in praying and thanksgiuing in the pub∣like congregation: and therefore I say againe that in the publike Churche, though knéeling be not the onely, yet it is the fittest gesture for praying: neyther can you

Page 599

more obiect the sitting of Christe against it, than you maye his supping at nyghte, agaynst our receyuing in the morning.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.