The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.

About this Item

Title
The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.
Author
Whitgift, John, 1530?-1604.
Publication
Printed at London :: By Henry Binneman, for Humfrey Toye,
Anno. 1574.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Cartwright, Thomas, 1535-1603. -- Replye to an answere made of M. Doctor Whitgifte -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Episcopacy -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 8, 2024.

Pages

Page 584

The. 3. diuision.

Admonition.

Touching Deacons though their names be remayning, yet is the office foully peruerted and turned vpside downe, for their duetie in the Primitiue Churche, was to (s) 1.1 gather the a〈1 line〉〈1 line〉mes di∣ligently, and to distribute it faythfully: also for the sicke and impotent persons to prouide payne∣fully, hauing euer a diligent care, that the charitie of godly men were not wasted vpon loyte∣rers (t) 1.2 and idle vagabounds.

Ansvvere to the Admonition. Pag. 118. Sect. 2.

It is true that in the primitiue Churche, the office of a Deacon was to collect and prouide for the poore, but not only, for it was also their office to preache, and to baptise. For Stephen and Philip bee∣ing Deacons dyd preache the Gospell. Acts. 6. 7. 8. And Philip dyd baptise the Eunuche. Act. 8.

T. C. Pag. 128. Sect. 1.

In the. 118. page, vnto the example of Philip he addeth S. Stephen, whyche was one of the Deacons, which he affirmeth to haue preached. But I denie it: for all that long oration which he hath in the seuenth of the Actes, is no sermon, but a de〈1 line〉〈1 line〉ense of him selfe, agaynst those accusations whych were layde agaynst hym, as (*) 1.3 M. Beza dothe very learnedly and substantially proue in his annotations vpon those places of S. Stephens disputations and defense. Nowe to defende himselfe beeing accused, is lawfull not for the Deacons onely, but for any other Christian, and we reade nothing that Stephen did there, eyther touching the defense of his cause, or the sharpe rebu∣king of the obstinate Pharisies and Priestes, but that the holy Martyrs of God which were no deacons nor ministers haue done with vs, when they haue bene conuented before their persecutors: and whereas he 〈1 line〉〈1 line〉ayth, that Philip baptised, I haue shewed before by what authoritie he dyd it, that is, not in that he was a Deacon, but for 〈◊〉〈◊〉 he was an Euangelist.

Io. Whitgifte.

This is a harde and new deuised shifte. You imagine (as I thinke) that you are in* 1.4 the Logike or Philosophy scholes, where you may feyne what distinctions you liste, but al wil not serue. The accusations are conteyned in the. 13. &. 14. verse of the. 6. chap. let the Reader compare his sermon with them, & iudge whether he spake in the way of preaching, or of defending himselfe. Although a man may make his Apologie in preaching, & answere accusations in a sermon: and surely that sharpe & seuere re∣pr〈1 line〉〈1 line〉hension, that he concludeth with, beginning at the. 51. verse, doth euidently declare that it was a sermon: Moreouer it was in the Synagogue which was called the Sy∣nagogue of the Libertines. &c. The ende of it was to proue true religion, and the true worshipping of God, to be affixed neither to the Temple, nor to external ceremonies, but to consist of fayth in God. And yet I do not deny but that Stephē also did vse this sermon as an answere to those matters, wherof he was accused: but he answered in the way of preaching, & not of pleading. And that doth M. Gualter directly affirme: for* 1.5 although he cal this an oration, & a defense, yet in the. 8. chap. he proueth by this exam∣ple of Stephen, that Deacōs were permitted togither with the charge of the goods of the Churche, and of the poore, to preache, as I haue shewed before. And the Authors of the Centuries, speaking of that time, say thus: It appeareth also out of the. 6. & 8. of the Acts* 1.6 that Deacons did teach. And in the same booke & chap. Others were Deacons, whose office was to serue the tables at Ierusalem, so long as there was there a cōmunitie of goods. Act. 6. notwithstāding it appeareth by Steuen, Act. 6. & by Philip, Act. 8. that they did teach & work myracles, & euery where in other Churches, the office of Deacons was to teach & minister.

I can not finde in M. Beza his Annotatiōs any such thing, as you héere affirme. Al∣though if it were so, yet doth it not improue this to be a sermon: for then was the ora∣tion of Peters no sermō. Act. 2. wherin he answered to those that accused the Apostles of drunkennesse: neyther can Paule be sayde to haue preached. Act. 24. If this be true that an Apologie may not be made by the way of preaching. If it be lawfull thus to inuent distinctions to shift off so manyfest examples of Scriptures, then it is an easy matter to shift off any thing that shall be propounded.

Page 585

I haue proued by the Scripture it selfe, by Epiphanius, and by M. Gualter, and by the authors of the Centuries, that Philip béeing a Deacon dyd bothe baptise and preache, and you onely deny it, without eyther author or reason.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.