The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.

About this Item

Title
The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.
Author
Whitgift, John, 1530?-1604.
Publication
Printed at London :: By Henry Binneman, for Humfrey Toye,
Anno. 1574.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Cartwright, Thomas, 1535-1603. -- Replye to an answere made of M. Doctor Whitgifte -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Episcopacy -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 7, 2024.

Pages

T. C. Page. 95. Sect. 5.

The councell of Antioch ordeyned, that if the voyces of the byshops were euen, and that if* 1.1 * 1.2 halfe did condemne him, and halfe cleare him, that then the Metropolitane byshop should call of the next prouince some other byshops, which should make an end of the controuersie: whereby appea∣reth that the Metropolitane had so small authoritie and power ouer and aboue the rest, that he had not so much as the casting voyce, when both sides were euen. And therefore it appeareth that be∣sides the names of Metropolitane, there was little or no resemblance betweene those that were then, and those which be now.

Io. Whitgifte.

You haue written in the margent the. 17. canon of that councell, in the which ther are no suche words, nor any thing tending to that purpose: it is the. 14. canon, that I think you meane, for in that canō it is thus determined: that if a Byshop be iudged for* 1.3 certaine crimes and it happen that the other byshops of the same prouince varie in iudge∣ment, some thinking him to be innocent, some guiltie, for the resoluing of all doubte, it pleased the holy Synode, that the Metropolitane byshop shal call for other iudges out of the next prouince, to end the cōtrouersie, who togyther with the Byshops of the same prouince, shall approue that which is iust and right. Here is no mention of equalitie in voyces, but only of disagréeing in iudgemēt among the Byshops of the same prouince. Like∣wise in this canon it appeareth that a Metropolitane had authoritie ouer moe pro∣uinces than one, for he might cal the Byshops of another prouince to decide the mat∣ter, if the Byshops of the same prouince could not agrée.

I sée not how this canon can any thing help you: for now neyther the Metropoli∣tane,* 1.4 nor all the Byshops in the prouince can depriue any Byshop without the con∣sent of ye Prince: so that in that poynt the authoritie of the Metropolitane is nothing encreased, nor yet the authoritie of the Byshops. For then as it appeareth in the▪ 〈◊〉〈◊〉 canon of that councell, if a Priest or a Deacon had bin condemned of his owne byshop, o〈1 line〉〈1 line〉 a byshop of a Synode, it was not lawfull for them to complaine to the Emperoure: if they* 1.5 had complayned, it was determined in the same canon, that they should neuer be pardoned, nor haue any place of satisfaction, nor hope of restitution. But now it is farre other∣wise. The. 11. canon of the same councell is much to the same effect. Wherefore the* 1.6 authoritie of the Metropolitane & other Byshops is not encreased as you presēd, but both the Metropolitane and other Byshops had asmuch authoritie then ouer other priests, ministers, and deacons, as they haue now, as appeareth by sundry canons of

Page 441

the same councell.

In the. 4. canon it is decréede, that if a Byshop condemned by a Synode, or a priest, or* 1.7 a Deacon condemned by his owne Byshop, shal take vpon him to exercise any mini〈1 line〉〈1 line〉terie, he shall be without all hope of restitution, and who soeuer doth communicate with hym, shall be excommunicated. In the. 5 canon it is thus determined: If any priest or deacon* 1.8 contemning his proper Bishop, hath separated himselfe from the Churche, and gathering people apart, hath erected an altar, and hathe not obeyed the admonition of his Bishop, neyther hath consented and agreed vnto him calling him backe diuers times, let this man be condemned, and deposed by all meanes, and let him not obteyne any remedie afterward, bycause he cannot receiue againe his dignitie. But if he persist to trouble the Churche, let him be corrected by the outward power as a seditious person. By these canons it is eui∣dent that the Bishop of euery seuerall diocesse had authoritie by himselfe to excom∣municate, to depriue, and to seclude from the ministerie any priest, deacon, or any o∣ther of the cleargie in more ample and large manner, than he hath at this day. The which thing also may be séene in the. 6. &. 12. canons of the same Councell: so that you haue sought for help at the Councell, whiche is one of the greatest enimies to thys your assertion, and doth flatly condemne it. Diuers canons of the which Councell, if they were practised, woulde soone remedie the sects and schismes whiche you haue stirred.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.