Chap. 4. the. 20. Diuision.
The Ecclesiasticall and Ciuill gouernment maye not be confounded, or be together* 1.1 in one person. But to be a chiefe or a ruler is a ciuil power Ergo it can not be exercised by any Ecclesiasticall person.
Bothe these gouernmentes vvere confounded in Moyses: Therefore* 1.2 they may be confounded. And the priestes of Israell had the iudgemente and gouernment of the people. And Sainct Augustine was troubled vvith hearing and determining of causes, as it appeareth by Possidonius.
And vvhere you saye to be a chiefe or a ruler is a ciuil gouernment, nay in Ecclesiasticall causes it is ecclesiasticall gouernment and not ciuil. And these differences of gouernment may not so vnaduisedly be confounded. This is the key of ecclesiasticall correction, and belongeth only to the ec∣clesiastical officer, and to none other. Hereof S. Paule sayth, Seniorem ne corri∣pueris nisi sub. &c. Tradidi illum Satanae. &c. This iurisdiction is not ciuill but eccle∣siasticall, and therefore may be exercised by any ecclesiasticall person.
The answere of the Bishoppe vnto the fourthe supposed reason, perteyneth vnto an other question, that is, whether Ecclesiastical persons oughte to exercise ciuill iurisdiction, wherevnto I will answere by Gods grace when I come to speake vppon occasion of M. Doctors booke of that question. In the meane tyme I will desire the reader to consyder what weake groun∣des the Archebishoppe and Archedeacon stande vppon, seeyng that the Bishoppe of Sarum, being so learned a man, and of so greate readyng, coulde say no more in their defense, whiche not∣withstandyng in the controuersies agaynst Doctor Harding is so pythie and so plentyfull.
The Bishop of Sarum hathe sayde muche more than you haue answered vnto: