The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.

About this Item

Title
The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.
Author
Whitgift, John, 1530?-1604.
Publication
Printed at London :: By Henry Binneman, for Humfrey Toye,
Anno. 1574.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Cartwright, Thomas, 1535-1603. -- Replye to an answere made of M. Doctor Whitgifte -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Episcopacy -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 8, 2024.

Pages

Chap. 4. the. 19. Diuision.
T. C. Pag. 94. Sect. 2.

As for Erasmus authoritie which saith that Titus was an archbishop, I haue answered to it.

Page 434

And where as Chrysostome sayeth, that the iudgemente of many Bishoppes was committed to Titus, * 1.1 I haue declared in what sorte it is to be vnderstanded, and yet vppon these wor∣des the Bishoppe can hardly conclude, that whyche he dothe: that Titus hadde the gouern∣mente of many Bishoppes. For it is one thyng to saye, the iudgement of many was commit∣ted vnto Titus, and an other thing to say, that he had the gouernment of many.

Io. Whitgifte.

And shall the same answere serue for Lyra too? Well I haue answered your answere to Erasmus. And I truste that these authorities wyth the Godlie Reader shall haue the more credite, bycause this Reuerende Father dothe herein con∣firme their opinions: whose iudgement for his singular vertue and learning, ought to be more estemed, than a number suche as you are.

You neyther haue answered, nor doe answere, nor can answere these wordes of Chrysostome, and it is but a verie poore shifte, to make suche a distinction be∣twixte iudgemente and gouernment. For what is it else to haue the iudgemente of ma∣nye Byshoppes commytted vnto hym, but to haue the gouernment? shewe a diffe∣rence if you can: No doubte you woulde haue doone it, if you coulde. Wherefore this authoritie of Chrysostome remayneth vntouched: and it confirmeth my an∣swere to the Gréeke Scholiast, who borrowed his wordes of him. Neyther would you haue thus dalyed in this place, if you had looked vppon Chrysostomes wordes, who there affirmeth, that Paule didde commytte to Titus, the whole yle of Creta.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.