For the 〈◊〉〈◊〉 〈1 line〉〈1 line〉ast reasons against the Archbyshop and Archdeacon, although I be well acquayn∣〈1 line〉〈1 line〉 〈◊◊〉〈◊◊〉 that fauour this cause, yet I did neuer heare them before in my life: and I beleue ther 〈◊◊◊〉〈◊◊◊〉 is be his reasons, whose they are supposed to be, and which did set downe the 〈◊◊◊◊〉〈◊◊◊◊〉 Byshop confuteth. Notwithstanding the former of these two seemeth to haue 〈◊◊◊〉〈◊◊◊〉, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 to be grounded of that place of Logike, that sheweth, that according as the 〈◊◊◊〉〈◊◊◊〉 of any thing is excellent, so are those things that are annexed and adioyned vnto 〈◊◊◊〉〈◊◊◊〉 I would she simplest should vnderstande what is sayde or written, I will willing∣〈1 line〉〈1 line〉 〈◊◊〉〈◊◊〉 reasons, the termes whereof are not easily perceyued, but of those whyche be 〈◊〉〈◊〉.
〈◊◊〉〈◊◊〉 you may dilclaime what you lyste, for you coulde neuer be brought before* 1.1 〈◊◊◊〉〈◊◊◊〉 downe your reasons in writing: and there is no holde at your worde, 〈◊◊◊◊◊◊〉〈◊◊◊◊◊◊〉, euen at your pleasure, and so wil diuerse of your com∣〈1 line〉〈1 line〉 as 〈◊〉〈◊〉 hath taught. But yet you thinke that this former reason hath a 〈◊◊〉〈◊◊〉. &c. 〈◊〉〈◊〉, you answere not one word to my L. of Sarums solution, which 〈◊◊〉〈◊◊〉 to be very fonde.