The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.

About this Item

Title
The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.
Author
Whitgift, John, 1530?-1604.
Publication
Printed at London :: By Henry Binneman, for Humfrey Toye,
Anno. 1574.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Cartwright, Thomas, 1535-1603. -- Replye to an answere made of M. Doctor Whitgifte -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Episcopacy -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

T. C. Page. 75. Sect. 3.

In neyther of the sentences heere alleaged out of Cyprian, nor in all his works as hathe bin before noted, is there one worde of an Archbishop, and yet M. Doctor sayth, that he speaketh of an Archbishop: before he shewed the name without the office, and now he goeth about to shew the office without the name: so that he can neuer make both the name and the office meete togither. To shape out an Archbishop here, you must needes interprete the words Bishop and priest, Arch∣bishop and high priest: for Cyprian maketh mention of no other name of ministerie in those places, and if you may haue this scope of interpreting, it will not be harde for you to proue that stones be bread, and that chalke is cheese.

Page 357

Io. Whitgifte.

Epiphanius lib. 2 tom. 2. haer. 69. dothe call the Bishop of Alexandria sometyme Bi∣shop,* 1.1 and sometime Archbishop. The Councell of Calceden in like maner calleth the same men, as Flauianus, Dioscorus, Leo, & other, sometimes Bishops, and sometimes Archebishops: the lyke is to be séene in other authors and wryters. So that the o∣mitting of the title is no reason at all to disproue the thing. It is certayne that in Cyprians time, this name Papa was a common name to many Bishops, those espe∣cially that were of fame, as M. Foxe at large declareth, tom. 1. fol. 11. And yet doth not Cyprian vse that title commonly when he wryteth to Cornelius, or to any other Bi∣shop. This therfore is but a féeble argument.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.