Chap. 3. the. 38. Diuision.
But what helpeth it you that there was a Bishop of Alexandria, which vrge an Archbishop, or what auantageth it you, that there was one chief, called a Bishop in euery seuerall congrega∣tion, which wold proue that there ought to be one Bishop chief ouer a thousand congregations? What coulde haue bin brought more strong to pull downe the Archbishop out of his throne, then that which Ierom faith there, when he affirmeth that the Bishop of the obscurest village or ham∣let, hath as great authoritie and dignitie as the Bishop of Rome? Erasmus did see this, and sayd 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, that is, * 1.1 testingly, that Hierome spake that of the Bishops of his tyme, but if the had seene howe the Metropolitanes of our age excell other Bishops, he woulde haue spoken o∣therwise. And what could haue ben more fit to haue confuted the large dominion and superioritie of our realme, than that that Ierome sayeth, when he appointeth the Bishops sea in an vplan∣dish town, or in a poore village or hamlet, (a) 1.2 declaring therby that in euery town there was a Bi∣shop, and that the Bishop that he speaketh of, differeth nothing at all from an elder, but that the Bishop had the ordeyning of ye ministers, whervpon it doth appere (which I promised to shew) that by this place of Ierome, there is neither name of Archbishop, nor so much as the shadowe of his authoritie, and that the Bishoppes whiche are nowe, haue besides the name, no similitude almoste with the Bishopes that were in Ieromes tyme. As for his reason ad Luciferanos, it is the same which he hath ad Euagr. and to Titus, and is alreadie answ〈1 line〉〈1 line〉red.
If this be true that you say, why haue you then hitherto sought so to deface this worthie writer? why did you not in the beginning tell vs, that this saying óf Ierome made nothing against you, bicause he only speaketh of Pastors in seuerall parishes, and not of one to haue charge and gouernment ouer one whole dioces? But full* 1.3 well knew you the vanitie of this your fansie, & how vnlyke it is to stande with Ie∣romes words: For in his cōmentaries vpon ye epistle to Titus, he sayth that Post{que} v∣〈1 line〉〈1 line〉usquis{que} eos quos baptizauerat. &c. After that euery one did think those to be his, & not Chri stes, whom he had baptized, it was decreed throughout the whole world, that one of the mi∣nisters being chosen should be set ouer the rest, vnto whome the whole care of the churche should aperteyn, and the seeds of schismes be taken away. Do you thinke yt this is ment of the Pastor of euery towne? To what purpose shoulde Ierome saye so? For the pa∣stor of euery seueral towne, had from the beginning his a〈1 line〉〈1 line〉thorite ouer his flocke, without any such constitution. Moreouer, there are not in euery seuerall congregatiō many pastors or priestes, ouer whom one shold be placed as chief. But Ierome spea∣keth of a Bishop that must gouerne the other Priestes, and procure that vnitie bée kept among them, and therfore his iurisdiction must of necessitie extend to many pa∣rishes, bicause it is ouer many pastors. He sayth lykewise, that the care of the whole was cōmitted vnto him. In his epistle ad Euagrium, he vttereth his meanyng as plainly, For he sayeth, That the Priests did choose one among themselues, whome they placing* 1.4 in a higher degree called a Bishop: Wherby it apeareth yt he had authoritie ouer many Pastors, and therfore ouer many congregations, for you will not denie but that e∣uery presbyter, that is minister of the worde had his seuerall flocke. This he decla∣reth more euidently by the examples there vsed, of souldiers choosing their Captain, for though the Captain before was a common souldiour, yet now being 〈1 line〉〈1 line〉hus prefer∣red, he ruleth and gouerneth the reste of the souldiers, euen so the Bishop being before a minister equall with other, yet being chosen to that degrée, he is their guide and gouernoure, a gouernour I say of those that did elect him, that ist of Priests or ministers, & therfore of diuers congregations.
This dothe yet more euidentely appeare in these woordes of the same Epistle, That one was afterwardes chosen to rule the reste, it was a remedie against schismes, least euerie one drawing to himselfe the Churche, shoulde breake the same. And in his booke* 1.5 contra Luciferianos, he sayeth that except the chief authoritie were giuen to one, tot es∣sent schismata quot sacerdotes, there would be as many schismes as priests. By which places