The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.

About this Item

Title
The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.
Author
Whitgift, John, 1530?-1604.
Publication
Printed at London :: By Henry Binneman, for Humfrey Toye,
Anno. 1574.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Cartwright, Thomas, 1535-1603. -- Replye to an answere made of M. Doctor Whitgifte -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Episcopacy -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 7, 2024.

Pages

T. C. Pag. 80. Sect. 3.

Furthermore, if this distinction came vp in the Apostles tyme, and by them, how commeth it to passe, that they neuer mention it, nay how commeth it to passe that euen S. Paule in that very E∣pistle where these voyces are founde (I holde of Paule, I of Apollo, I of Cephas whiche are* 1.1 sayde to be the cause of the Archbishop) ordeyneth a cleane contrarie to this that M. doctor com∣mendeth? (a) 1.2 For when two or three Prophets haue expounded the scriptures, he appoynteth that all the rest that are there, should iudge whether they haue done well or no.

Page 375

Io. Whitgifte.

I contend not that the name of the Archbishop was in the Apostles tyme, but you haue not yet proued that the office was not then, or that there was then no superio∣ritie among the Cleargie, which you notwithstanding denie. Your negatiue rea∣son proueth nothing, as you haue bene oftentymes tolde.

The place in the. 1. Cor. 14. is farre fetched, it speaketh not of gournment, and* 1.3 discipline, or externall pollicie of the Church, but of expounding the Scriptures. And what a reason cal you this S. Paule, saith. 1. Cor. 14. Prophet〈1 line〉〈1 line〉 duo aut tres loquantur, caete〈1 line〉〈1 line〉i dijudicent: Let two or three Prophets speake, and let the other iudge, Ergo he speaketh a∣gaynst an Archbishop? Surely if the Authours of the Admonition had not bene de∣tected of their vnskilfull allegations of Scriptures, I shoulde haue had as much a doe with you in that poynt: for euen of these fewe which you haue vsed, there is not al∣most one rightly and truely applied. S. Paule in that place to the Corinthians shew∣eth, that the hearers must iudge of the doctrine of the Prophets, whether it be accor∣ding to the worde of God or no, as those did whiche are commended in the. 17. of the Actes: but what is this to an Archbishop?

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.