That there was none in the yt Apostles times, thus it may appeare. If there were any they were either ordeined by the Apostles, & their authoritie, or else without and besides their authoritie. If there were any without & besides their authoritie; then they are therefore to be condemned yt more, bicause in their time they starie vp without their warrant. And if the Apostles did ordeine them, there was some vse of them, to that whervnto they were ordeined, but there was no vse of them to that whervnto they were ordeined, therfore the Apostles did not ordeine them. The vse whervnto M. Doctor saith they were ordeined, was to compose controuersies and ende schismes, but to this they were not vsed: wherevpon it followeth, that if there were any they were vnprofitable. That they were not vsed to any such ende it shall be perceiued by that which followeth.
This should be the proofe of your former Minor, if the argument had bene good: but be it as you would haue it, here is yet no sufficient proofe of your Minor. They are but only your owne bare words, which may as easily be reiected, as they be barely by you affirmed. But least the ignorant reader shoulde thinke that I shifte of matters wyth suche quidities as they vnderstand not, I will set a side the deformed face of your ar∣gument, and come to the matter, & (as I thinke) your meaning, which is this. Con∣trouersies were compounded in the Apostles time without an Archbyshop, Ergo they maye lyke∣wise be so now, so that there is no neede of any Archbishop. This is the controuersie, whe∣ther the Church be bound to the same kind of external gouernment at all times, that was vsed in ye Apostles times. I haue proued hetherto that it is not. And more is to be* 1.1 said of the same afterwards. In the meane time this I giue you to vnderstand, that al∣thoughe the Apostles had not this name of Archbishop among them, yet they had the same authoritie and office. For they had the gouernment & direction of diuers Chur∣ches, both in matters of doctrin & discipline: they ended controuesies, repressed errors, kept them in quietnesse: ordeined them Bishops, & visited them, as appeareth Act. 14. 15. 18. 1. Cor. 3. 4. 5. 〈1 line〉〈1 line〉. & in the Epistle to Timothie & Titus. Euseb. lib. 3. cap. 23. declareth of Iohn the Euangelist, that after he returned from Pathmos, he visited & gouerned sundry Churches, & ordeined them Ministers. The like doth Epiphanius report of Pe∣ter in Pontus & Bithinia Lib. 1. Tom. 2. And what other office then those hath the Archbi∣shop. Therfore though the name of Archbishop was not among the Apostles, yet was his office & function. And notwithstanding that part of the office of the Apostles is cea∣sed which consisted in planting & founding of Churches, throughout ye world: yet this part of gouernment & direction of Churches remaineth still and is committed to By∣shops. Therefore saith Ambrose in the. 4. ad Ephe. Apostoli Episcopi sunt, Apostles are By∣shops,* 1.2 bicause Bishops do succeede them in preaching the word, & gouerning ye church.