The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.
About this Item
Title
The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall.
Author
Whitgift, John, 1530?-1604.
Publication
Printed at London :: By Henry Binneman, for Humfrey Toye,
Anno. 1574.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Cartwright, Thomas, 1535-1603. -- Replye to an answere made of M. Doctor Whitgifte -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Episcopacy -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15130.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 1, 2024.
Pages
Chap. 3. the. 14. Diuision.
T. C. Pag. 78. Lin. 26.
There are other reasons which M. Doctor vseth, as this, a notable one. S. Cyprian speaketh* 1.1 not of the vsurped power of the Bishop of Rome, therfore he speaketh of the office of an Archebi∣shop and Metropolitane. It is harde to call this argument to any head of fallation, for it hath not so muche as a colour of a reason. I thinke it can deceyue no body but your selfe.
Io. Whitgifte.
I tell you that the place is not to be vnderstanded of the vsurped authoritie of the Bishop of Rome, but of the authoritie of the Archebishop in his Prouince, or By∣shop in his Diocesse. I doe not make any argument of it: dothe it gréeue you to heare that Cyprian dothe not speake of the vsurped authoritie of the Bishop of Rome? or doth euery man make an argument when he dothe interprete? But this dealing of yours is not straunge, I must be content to beare with it.
Notes
* 1.1
This argument is of your owne ioyning, and not M. Doctors.