The wordes of Augustine be plaine, neyther can they be so shifted of. And it ma∣keth euidently against your distinction that he sayth such things may not be conuerted into priuate vses. A man may cauill with the most manifest authorities either of scrip∣tures or fathers, that can be: but euery shifte and cauill is not a sufficient answere. This proposition is by these wordes of Augustine directly proued: that things altoge∣ther dedicated to Idols and vsed in Idolatrie may be afterwarde vsed in the seruice of God, and to his honour, which is the state of our question. And bycause this is a materiall poynt, and peraduenture Saint Augustine his authoritie is not much regarded of you, I will set downe M. Caluine his opinion also touching the same matter, who in hys Harmonie vpon the bookes of Moyses, vpon these words in the. 23. of Erodus ver. 24. Thou shalt vtterly ouerthrowe, and breake in peeces their Images, sayth t〈1 line〉〈1 line〉us: we make it* 1.1 not now any scruple of conscience to reteine still those Churches which were polluted with Idols, and to put them to better vse bycause that whiche is added to the lawe propter conse∣quentiam (as they terme it) doth not bynde vs. I graunt that all those things which doe tende to the planting of superstition ought to be taken awaye, so that, by precise vrging of that vvhich is of it selfe indifferent, vve be not in to much rigour, Supersti∣tious. The place is worth the noting, it fully ouerthroweth your groundes agaynst the apparell.
Saint Augustine in that sermon quoted in your margent, speaketh against such as professing Christianitie did notwithstanding resort to the temples of the Paganes at their solemnities and feasts, thinking it sufficient, if they did in heart detest the Idols, though in bodie they were present in their temples and at their feasts: much like vn∣to those that thinke it sufficient to serue God in heart, though in bodie they be present