Of the residence of the Pastor. Tract. 5. (Book 5)
Chap. 1. the first Diuision.
Now that I haue proued that there are no Euangelists, Prophets or Apostles, and that the ministeries of the word, which remayne, are limited vnto certayne places: I will take that whiche you graunt, that is, that the Pastor or Byshop ought to haue a speciall flocke. And demand of you, wherefore he should haue it? Is it not to attend vpon it? And can he attend vpon it, vnlesse he be resident and abiding vpon it? But he cannot be abiding vpon it, if he go from place to place to preach where he thinketh necessarie. Therefore being Pastor or Byshop of a congregation allotted vnto* 1.1 him, he may not go from place to place to preach where he thinketh good, much lesse to haue a ma∣stership of a colledge in one corner of the land, a Deanry in another, and a Prebend in the thirde, and so be absent from his pastorall charge in such places, where eyther he preacheth not, or needeth not to preach, those places being otherwise furnished without him. For then how is this difference kept betweene the Pastor and other ministers, that the one is tyed to a place, and the other is not. For if you say, that it is in that he shall preach more at his flocke, than at other places, I answere that the Euangelists and Apostles did carrie longer in one place, than in another, and taught some congregations yeares, whē they did not othersome moneths. And therfore they say nothing, which alleadge for the nonresidence of Pastors that S. Paule called Timothie and Titus from Ephe∣sus and Crete, for first they were Euangelists and no Pastors, then they went not of their owne heads, but called of the Apostle, which was a chiefe gouernoure of the Church. And thirdly they went not, but hauing other sufficient put in their place, as it appeareth in their seuerell epistles, so that if that place make any thing it maketh not to proue the non residencie, but rather whether a minister may be translated from one Church to another.
Your reader, if he iudge indifferently, cannot but acknowledge this, that you so cō∣fidently speake of proores, to be but a vaine bragge and nothing so.
There is no man that denieth but that a Pastor ought so to attend vpō his slocke,* 1.2 as he may be well able to do his duetie towards the same, and with a good conscience answer his doings before the chiefe Pastor, to whome he shall giue his accompte. In the meane time if he be godly, if he preach among them as often as he is perswaded to be conuenient, if he haue a care ouer them, that they be not destitute of that, whiche is necessarie, if he haue such as are honest, learned, and diligent to supply his absence, he may be bolde to say to his vnlawfull iudges, tu quis es, qui iudicas alienum seruum, pro∣prio* 1.3 domino stat, aut cadit. VVho art thou, which condemnest another mans seruant? he stan∣deth or falleth to his owne Master▪ Whether a Pastor hauing a flocke, may also preach out of his owne charge, is another question. And although it be by you denyed, yet by∣cause your words without proofe weigh not much, I will (for the auoiding of confu∣sion) speake nothing thereof in this place, but this only, that as the opinion is strange, so is it most vntrue, and not to be iustifyed eyther by Scripture, aunciente fathers, or reasons.
But (oh T C.) who séeth not the mark, you shoote at? who perceyueth not how you* 1.4 slide from the matter to the person? To what ende do you here recite a mastership of a colledge, a Deanrie▪ a Prebend, but that your meaning is to note some one particular man, whome (bycause he hath withstoode your erroneous and contentious doctrine, hath not exalted you, as it is wel knowne you haue desired, hath executed those lawes vpon you, whiche (for the auoyding of manifest and wilfull periurie) you oughte to* 1.5 haue executed of your selfe) you séeke by all meanes possible to deface. Is this consci∣ence▪ Is this praebe, e te beneuolum magistro, non solùm dum in eo vixeris, sed etiam postea pro vi∣rill. &c. The Lord forgiue you, and giue you grace to know your selfe.