Platina also in the lyfe of Pope Adrian the seconde, writeth that Ludouike the second by his let∣ters (a) 1.1 commaunded the Romains that they should choose their owne bishop, not loking for other mens voyces, which being strangers could not so well tell what was done in the common weale where they were strangers, and that it apperteyneth to the citizens.
The same Platina witnesseth in the lyfe of Pope Leo the. 8. that when the people of Rome were earnest with the Emperour Otho the fyrst, that he would take away one Pope Iohn yt liued verie licentiously & riotously, & place an other, the same Emperor answered, that it perteined to the clergie and people, to choose one, and willed them that they should choose, and he would approue it: and when they had chosen Leo, and after put him out without cause, and chose one Pope Ben∣net, he compelled them to take Leo againe. Wherby appeareth, that in those estates where Ma∣gistrates were Christian, and where the estate was moste of all Monarchicall, that is subiecte to ones gouernmente, and also when the Church put out any without good cause, that then the Ma∣gistrates should compell the Churches to doe their dutie. In deede the Bishop of Rome gaue the election then into the Emperou〈1 line〉〈1 line〉 his handes, bycause of the lightnesse of the people, as Platina maketh mention, but that is not the matter, for I doe nothing else here but shew that the elec∣tions of the ministers by the Churche were vsed in the times of the Emperours, and by their con∣sentes. And seyng that Otho confessed it perteyned not vnto him, it is to be doubted, whether hee tooke it at the Bishop his handes.
You haue not truly reported the wordes of Platina in the first place, for he sayth* 1.2 not that the Emperour Ludouike did commaund the Romains that they should choose their own Bishop, but that he commended them for their godlie and sound choise. His wordes be these: Superuenere à Ludouico Imperatore literae, quibus Romanos admodùm laudat, quòd summum* 1.3 Pontificem sanctè & integrè creassent, There came letters from Ludouike the Emperoure, wherin he praiseth the Romans very muche, bicause they had holily and syncerely created the high Priest. &c. But Platina declareth how tumultuous an election that was, and howe iniuriously the Emperours Embassadors were secluded from the same, hauing therin interest: and although the Emperoure was contente to put vp that iniurie, and to commend that election (peraduenture for some worldly respect) yet it is ma∣nifest, that then the Bishops of Rome began to vsurpe vppon the authoritie of the Emperour, and to seclude him from hauing any interest in their elections. M. Bale* 1.4 speaking of this election sayth: Vi enim eligendi pontificis potestatem, ad se tunc rapiebant Romani, For the Romaines then tooke by force vnto them selues power to choose their Bishop.
The second place of Platina argueth the vndiscretenesse of the people both in pla∣cing and displacing their Bishop, and the authoritie of the Emperour in taking this authoritie of placing and displacing from them, when they doe abuse it: for here hée put out Benet whom they had chosen, & placed Leo whom they had displaced, wher∣by it appeareth, that there was not then any one suche prescripte forme of electing the Bishop of Rome, but that it was in the authoritie of the Emperour, to abrogate, alter, or chaunge it. All this is nothing to the improuing of my assertion, for I de∣nie not, but that the people had interest in elections of Bishops, in diuers places, and especially in the Church of Rome, a long tyme: But this dothe not proue, that there is any prescript rule in Scripture, for the election of ministers whiche maye not be altered, and chaunged from tyme to tyme, as shall be moste conuenient for the pre∣sente state of the Churche: naye whatsoeuer ye haue hitherto sayde, proueth the contrarie.