Where do those that write the Centuries suspecte that Canon? why note you not the place? there is not one worde tending to that end, in that place where they speake of this Councell. Neyther as I thinke are you able to shew any suche thing affirmed by them, and it is the first time that euer I either red or heard it doubted, whether thys were a Canon of that councell or no. In the. 4. Cent. col. 435. I find these words: variant ab 〈1 line〉〈1 line〉ac consuetudine, mirum qua veritate, constitutiones Concilij Laodiceni, quae ordinationes iudicio multitudinis fieri probibuerunt. The constitutions of the Councel of Laodicea, which forbad* 1.1 the ordeyning (of ministers) to be done by the iudgement of the multitude, do varie from this custome (of electing by the people) it is maruel by what truth. But no mā can hereof gather that they doubt whether this Canon be a bastard or no. Only they doubt whether this decrée was made according to the truth. The general Councel at Cōstantinople, which is called Synodus. 6. did both allow this councell, and ratifye it.
It is not greatly materiall at what time this Councell was holden: Neyther dothe it follow that bycause this decrée was now made against such elections of the people, therefore the people had before this time in al places interest, in electing of ministers: for it may be that some claimed this interest, and moued the people to contende for it then, as you do now: and therefore the Synode might vpon that occasiō make this de∣termination: as the like might be made at this time in this Churche of Englande, a∣gainst such parishes as take vpon them the election of their Pastors, as you before af∣firmed* 1.2 some to do: and yet we could not therevpon truly conclude, that before the time of this prohibition the election of ministers was either generally, or orderly cō∣mitted to the people in this Church of England.