You say that howsoeuer in the Apostles tyme. this vse was of hauing the consent of the church in the choyse of their Pastor or Bishop, nowe in this state it were moste pernicious and hurte∣full. Wherein, see howe (a) 1.1 vnaduisedly you condemne the churches of Geneua, of all Fraunce, of certayne of the Germayne churches, which keepe this order. But you alleage your reasons, ther∣fore those are to be considered, bicause they come so rare. For your maner is, that if you can haue but one writer new or olde, of your side, or which seemeth to be of your side, you runne away with the matter, as though you had scripture, reason, Doctors, and all.
I will therefore then take a view of your reasons, when as I shal haue briefly set downe those reasons, wherby the perpetuall equitie, reasonablenesse, & conueniencie of this order, that the church should haue a stroke in hir ministers election, may appeare.
I condemne no Churches that haue appoynted any order for the electing of their Pastors, which they thinke to be agreable to their state, and moste profitable for them: for therefore I say, that no certayne maner or forme of electing ministers is prescribed in the Scripture, bicause euery Churche may doe therein as it shall séeme to be moste expediente for the same. That maye be profitable for the Churches of Ge∣neua and Fraunce. &c. whiche woulde be moste hurtefull to this Churche of Englande.