censure questions of this nature, which are touching circum∣stance, [ A] so hardly, as to make euery such difference a fundamen∣tall errour, especially because some among themselues (as the Master of the schole reporteth ) affirme the same.
Thirdly, whereas the Obiector addeth, that Protestants de∣nie the necessitie of Baptisme for Infants, granting them Salua∣tion without Baptisme; he must vnderstand, that necessitie is ei∣ther [ B] absolute, or else of precept and supposition. We verily maintaine the latter necessitie of Baptisme, for the saluation of Infants, against the Pelagians and Anabaptists: and the contempt and wilfull neglect of this holy Sacrament is damnable to such as are guiltie of this contempt: and our Church prouideth di∣ligently, that all Infants (if it be possible) may receiue Baptisme before they depart this life. But if it fall out ineuitable , that new borne babes, descending of Christian parents, cannot re∣ceiue this Sacrament, not onely Protestants, but the antient Church it selfe, and discreeter Papists, haue thought it more [ C] pious to hope of Gods indulgence towards such infants, than to aggrauate his vengeance with such rigour and extremitie, as the Trent Fathers , and their disciples do.
First, the antient Church allotted onely two seasons in the yeare for Baptisme, which they could not in their charitie haue thus restrained to set times, if they had beene persuaded [ D] as moderne Papals are.
Secondly, Gerson , Biel , and Caietan , with many other famous Pontificians , affirme, That Infants departing this life without Baptisme, may be saued by the speciall Grace of God, and by the prayers and faith of their parents. And the words of Thomas Elysius , a late Pontifician, are very remarkeable, saying, Opinio quam tenent Theologi plurimi, & Ecclesia secun∣dum communem legem, est satis dura & onerosa, & non conformis [ E]