A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*

About this Item

Title
A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*
Author
White, Francis, 1564?-1638.
Publication
London :: Printed by Adam Islip,
1624.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Fisher, John, 1569-1641 -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15082.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15082.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 3, 2024.

Pages

ANSWER.

Out of your owne fancies you may conclude what you please: but from the Fathers nothing can be concluded, repug∣nant to that which Protestants hold, concerning the perspicui∣ty [ D] of sacred Scripture, euen in it selfe. Ireneus saith a 1.1, All the Scrip∣tures both Propheticall and Euangelicall, are cleere without ambiguity, and may indifferently bee heard of all men. S. Hierom b 1.2, It is the manner of the Scripture to ioine that which is manifest to such things as are obscure. S. Cyril c 1.3, That they may be knowne of all people both small and great, they are profitably commended vnto vs in a famili∣ar kind of speaking, that they may exceed the capacitie of none. S. Augustine d 1.4, Plaine places are found in them to expound and open the darke and hard. S. Gregorie e 1.5, The Scripture hath so much in

Page 45

open 〈◊〉〈◊〉 as may feed little ones. S. Chrysoft. a 1.6, Scriptures are 〈◊〉〈◊〉 [ A] like mettals, which haue need of workemen to digge them out, but they deliuer a treasure readie at hand, for them which seeke hidden riches in them. It is sufficient to looke into them, that you may depart repleni∣shed with all fruit, it is sufficient onely to open them, that you may pre∣sently behold the splendor of their pearles. And although the anti∣ent Fathers do many times referre people to Tradition b 1.7 espe∣cially in three cases: First, For the testifying of the number and integritie of the Bookes of Canonical Scripture: Second∣ly, For the cleering of some hard or ambiguous Texts of Scrip∣ture, from the new and forged expositions of Heretickes: [ B] Thirdly, For externall rites and ceremonies: yet neither the Fathers, nor the more learned Papists themselues c 1.8, do hold that there is a large and general Commentarie of all the Scriptures, or of all the difficill places thereof, receiued from the Apo∣stles, and preserued vntill our daies; neither doe the Fathers d 1.9 hold, that people cannot read the holy Scripture with profit, or collect the true meaning of them in points substantiall and necessarie, without such a Commentarie.

First, If such a Commentarie were extant, it must be found in the elder Fathers, Tertullian, Ireneus, Origen, &c. But the Pa∣pists [ C] themselues e 1.10 will not alwaies be tied to their Expositi∣ons, as appeareth by their forsaking of Tertullian in the Expo∣sition of the wordes of the Gospell, Hoc est corpus meum f 1.11, This is my bodie; and by their forsaking of Origen g 1.12 in many of his Expositions; and againe of Tertullian h 1.13 in his Expositi∣on of Math. 16. 17.

Secondly, The Exposition of Scripture, giuen by the Fa∣thers, is many times repugnant, and different each of them from other, as Sixtus Senensis in his Bibliotheca, and Cardinall

Page 46

〈◊〉〈◊〉 in his Commentaries, and other Pontificians doe shew, a 1.14 [ A] but if there had beene a large and generall Commentarie of Scripture, or of all, or most of the harder places of Scripture, the antient Fathers, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 nearest vpon the Apostles, must haue knowne and followed that, and so could neither haue er∣red in exposition, nor differed one for the other.

Thirdly, the Fathers affirme; that the Scripture expounds it selfe; Aug. d. verb. 〈◊〉〈◊〉. Serm. 2. a 1.15 & d. vnit. Eccles. c. 5. p. 427. Chrys. sup. Gen. Hom. 13. b 1.16 And they doe not alwayes referre men to Tradition, concerning exposition of Scripture, but pre∣scribe other rules and meanes also. Aug. d, Doctr. Christ. l. 4. c. 30. [ B] &c. Chrys. sup. Gen. Hom. 21. & sup. Rom. Hom. 13. & sup. Iohn Hom. 39. Tertul. c. prax. Hilar d. Trinit. l. 5. Ambros. 〈◊〉〈◊〉. Psal. 118. Serm. 8. Origen. Mat. Hom. 25.

Fourthly, that which the Aduersarie affirmeth touching the Fathers, to wit, that they held the Scriptures to be cleare in all substantiall points, onely to men beforehand instructed, by the light of Tradition, is vntrue; neither doe the Fathers speake of Tradition according to the Romish acceptation.

First, sometimes the Fathers exhort heathen men, which were not instructed by Tradition, to reade the Scriptures. Theo∣philus [ C] Antiochenus saith to Autolicus, c 1.17 being as then a Pagan, Ve∣rum tu ipse si placet consule liter as sacras: But doe thou thy selfe if it seeme good vnto thee, consult with the holy Scriptures. Also they prouoke Heretikes, which denied the Tradition of the Church, to examine truth by Scriptures: August. d. vnit. Ec∣cles. c. 2.3.16. & contra Maxim. Arrian. l. 3. c. 14. Socrates Hist. lib. 1. cap. 6.

Secondly, by Tradition they vnderstand not the fabulous dreames and inuentions of Papals, d 1.18 who like the Pharisees cor∣rupt the right sence of Scripture, by their vnwritten Traditi∣ons, [ D] and affirme those things to bee Apostolicall, which agree with the confessed Doctrine of the Apostles, like darkenesse with light: But the Fathers by Tradition, vnderstand such ex∣position of Scripture, as was vniformely receiued, and com∣mended for Apostolicall, by the Primatiue Church, and which besides antiquitie, or the report of men, appeared to bee Apo∣stolicall, by an exact harmonie and consent with the Text of the holy Scripture, to which it was applied. St. August. e 1.19 d.

Page 47

Bapt. c. Donatist. l.5, c.26. St. Cyprian. Epist. 74. Tertul. d. prae∣script. c.21. Ruffin. Hist. Ecclesiast. l.2. c.9. [ A]

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.