ANSVVER. [ C]
The sequel of the Maior is denied. It followeth not, that al∣though the mayne and substantiall points of faith must be firme∣ly knowne and beleeued, before we can securely reade and truely vnderstand the holy Scriptures, in the particular texts and secti∣ons thereof: therefore the said substantiall points are not belee∣ued vpon Scripture, but vpon Tradition vnwritten.
The reason of the inconsequence is, for that the mayne and substantiall points of faith, may be knowne and beleeued by the doctrine of the Scripture, touching the said points deliuered to [ D] people, by those which haue faithfully collected the same into a Summarie, out of the particular and distinct sentences of the ho∣ly Scriptures. And they that beleeue this doctrine of the Scrip∣tures, may attaine the knowledge and faith of substantiall points of Christianity, before themselues can reade and vnderstand the said Bookes: yet they resolue not their faith into vnwritten Tra∣dition (according to the Popish meaning, where by vnwritten Tra∣dition is vnderstood doctrine of faith, neither expresly nor inuoluedly contained in holy Scripture) but into the doctrine of the Scripture, collected and deliuered vnto them by others, and vertually and [ E] immediately into the holy Scripture it selfe (as I haue formerly shewed, in answer to the second Argument.)
That which followeth in the obiection touching the rule of faith, prooueth not that Christian beliefe is resolued lastly and