Euery Iesuit obserueth and obeyeth the constitutions of his [ A] order, &c. Ergo:
No Iesuit medleth with state matters.
Touching the Maior, we haue learned out of your owne Schoole, how easie it is for you to euade. For State matters (according to your Tenet) In ordine ad Deum, and Ad bonum spi∣rituale, become spirituall matters, and so may belong to the Ie∣suits proper cognisance. Also, Princes affaires, when the Pope pleaseth to declare them no Princes; are not Princes affaires, but Papall and Ecclesiasticall affaires; and then the Iesuits, stati∣sing, [ B] are still in their owne Element.
Secondly, a man must be of strong faith to beleeue your Mi∣nor to be Defide, or of morall certitude, if such constitutions be vnderstood as the words sound. At least he must be a stranger to the world, and haue liued an Anchoret, or Recluse in some Caue, who neuer heard of Campian, Parsons, Creswell, Garnet, Suares, Bellarmine, &c. Did F. Parsons obserue these constitutions of his Order, when he wrot his Dolman against his Maiesties ti∣tle, &c? Did Creswell the same, when he published his Philopa∣ter? [ C] Or, Bellarmine, and Suares, when the one wrote his Apo∣logie, and the other, his Contra sectam Anglicanam? Did Mari∣ana and Garnet this, when the one instructeth how to cure State mischiefes, by applying a dispatching Antidote to the head; and when the other put his annointed finger into the Powder? Now, what further assurance haue we, That this fawning per∣suader holdeth himselfe more bound than his fellowes, to such constitutions as he pretendeth, doe oblige the whole Or∣der? But the truth is, the Iesuiticall constitutions are of two sorts: Either Open and diuulged precepts, blased ad faciendum [ D] populum; [Mens bona, fama, fides, haec clarè, & vt audiat Hospes.
We Iesuits may not vnder pretence of Religion, attempt or consent to any enterprise, that may disturbe the quiet of Kings and King∣domes.]
Or else, priuate and secret instructions, to be put in vre as ad∣uantage for promoting the Papacie and Catholike cause, shall be offered. These, as higher and more sacred Principles, ouer∣rule the former: and so a Iesuit Breaking his rule, obserueth his rule. This distinction seemeth to be implyed in the very title
[ E] of instructions here set downe by the Iesuit, being in the mar∣gent stiled,
Monita generalia, prohibiting them to interrmed∣dle with affaires,
Quae adrationem status pertinent, there specify∣ing,
Principum foedera, regnorum iura & successiones. And besides,