A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*

About this Item

Title
A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*
Author
White, Francis, 1564?-1638.
Publication
London :: Printed by Adam Islip,
1624.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Fisher, John, 1569-1641 -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15082.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15082.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 4, 2024.

Pages

ANSWER.

Significations may be found in Types and figures, being no Sacraments; as in a Vine and Branches, a naturall Humane Bo∣die, a materiall House, or Temple, a Lambe led before the shea∣rer, [ E] and the like: but yet, because they are otherwise in the Sacrament, both in regard of a more perfect and liuely repre∣sentation, and also because a speciall Promise of Diuine assi∣stance and grace is annexed to the Sacramentall signes, vsed and receiued, according to Christs Institution, which belon∣geth

Page 479

not to other signes and figures, therefore it is inconse∣quent, [ A] to say one Element receiued alone, signifies as much in substance, as both: Ergo, the vse of one Element, is as profita∣ble and effectuall, as the vse and reception of both.

But if the obiection be reduced to forme, the defect will be more apparent.

If there is the same signification, of one single Element, which there is of both, then there is the same benefit obtained by receiuing one, which is obtained by receiuing both.

But there is the same signification of one single Element, which [ B] there is of both, to wit, spirituall Food, vnion of the Faithfull, and Christs passion: Ergo,

There is the same benefit obtayned, by receiuing in one kind, as in both.

I answer: First, denying the consequence of the Maior Pro∣position. For although there were the same signification in one Element, which is of both, yet there is not equall benefit rea∣ped by receiuing one, as is reaped by receiuing both; because the promise of Grace is annexed to the receiuing both, and [ C] not to the receiuing of one without the other: for when a pro∣mise is made vpon condition of a duty to be performed, the promise is not fulfilled, but vpon obseruing the condition. Now Christ hauing instituted the Sacrament as a seale of his Couenant, and appointed the same to be receiued in both kinds (as his Institution shewes) a 1.1 the Church cannot expect that Christ should fulfill his promise, in giuing his flesh and blood by the Sacrament, vnlesse the Church obserue his ordinance, and doe that which he appointed. Also, obedience is better [ D] than Sacrifice, 1. Sam. 15. 22. but when we administer and receiue in both kinds, we obey Christ, saying, Drinke ye all of this; and we disobey, when we doe otherwise. Therefore al∣though there were the same signification of one Element, which is of both, yet the same benefit is not reaped by recei∣uing one, which is obtained by receiuing both.

Secondly, to the assumption I answer, that there is a more perfect and liuely representation b 1.2 of spirituall feeding and refection, and of coniunction of the faithfull, and of Christs [ E] death and Sacrifice vpon the crosse, by both the signes, than by one: and pouring out of the wine c 1.3, doth in a cleerer manner represent and signifie the effusion of Christs bloud, and also the separation of his body and soule; and there is a more perfect

Page 480

* 1.4 similitude of nourishment in Bread and Wine a 1.5 together, than [ A] in Bread alone, Eccles. 4. 9. so likewise two Elements repre∣sent more than one, and nourish more than one, and vnite more than one. Otherwise, if the representation of one Element, were equall to the representation of both, to what purpose should our Sauiour institute a Sacrament in two kinds, which (according to Papists, who will seeme wiser than God) b 1.6 is as sufficient in one kind, as in both?

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.