not to other signes and figures, therefore it is inconse∣quent, [ A] to say one Element receiued alone, signifies as much in substance, as both: Ergo, the vse of one Element, is as profita∣ble and effectuall, as the vse and reception of both.
But if the obiection be reduced to forme, the defect will be more apparent.
If there is the same signification, of one single Element, which there is of both, then there is the same benefit obtained by receiuing one, which is obtained by receiuing both.
But there is the same signification of one single Element, which [ B] there is of both, to wit, spirituall Food, vnion of the Faithfull, and Christs passion: Ergo,
There is the same benefit obtayned, by receiuing in one kind, as in both.
I answer: First, denying the consequence of the Maior Pro∣position. For although there were the same signification in one Element, which is of both, yet there is not equall benefit rea∣ped by receiuing one, as is reaped by receiuing both; because the promise of Grace is annexed to the receiuing both, and [ C] not to the receiuing of one without the other: for when a pro∣mise is made vpon condition of a duty to be performed, the promise is not fulfilled, but vpon obseruing the condition. Now Christ hauing instituted the Sacrament as a seale of his Couenant, and appointed the same to be receiued in both kinds (as his Institution shewes) the Church cannot expect that Christ should fulfill his promise, in giuing his flesh and blood by the Sacrament, vnlesse the Church obserue his ordinance, and doe that which he appointed. Also, obedience is better [ D] than Sacrifice, 1. Sam. 15. 22. but when we administer and receiue in both kinds, we obey Christ, saying, Drinke ye all of this; and we disobey, when we doe otherwise. Therefore al∣though there were the same signification of one Element, which is of both, yet the same benefit is not reaped by recei∣uing one, which is obtained by receiuing both.
Secondly, to the assumption I answer, that there is a more perfect and liuely representation of spirituall feeding and refection, and of coniunction of the faithfull, and of Christs [ E] death and Sacrifice vpon the crosse, by both the signes, than by one: and pouring out of the wine , doth in a cleerer manner represent and signifie the effusion of Christs bloud, and also the separation of his body and soule; and there is a more perfect