A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*

About this Item

Title
A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*
Author
White, Francis, 1564?-1638.
Publication
London :: Printed by Adam Islip,
1624.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Fisher, John, 1569-1641 -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15082.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15082.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 3, 2024.

Pages

IESVIT.

I answer, That the Primmar or Office (so tearmed) of our Ladie, is not an Office properly and principally directed vnto her, but an Office containing praises of God, taken out of holy Scripture, wherein commemoration of her is made, [ D] so as I dare say, That the Prayers of the Office of our Ladie that are directed towards her, make not the hundred part thereof. And seeing it is most certaine, that the Christian Church in her best times, did frequently pray vnto Saints; what reason haue wee to thinke, that in her set forme of Prayers she did not vse to craue the intercessions of Saints? If it be lawfull, pious, and profitable, when we pray vnto God, to pray also to Saints, by their Mediation offering [ E] our Prayer to him, why should any dislike the doing of this in a set forme, that is allowed by the Church? why should this displease rather than an extemporall forme?

Page 353

But further wee can prooue, That the Church in her [ A] best times, did pray vnto Saints in set formes, as Catho∣lickes now doe, euen with a kinde of Lettanies, a forme of Prayer acknowledged and confessed by the Magdebur∣gians, * 1.1 to haue beene in vse euen in the fourth age after Christ. Jn which age the foure first generall Councells were held.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.