First, This latter Clause is onely a vaine ostentation, and re∣petition [ A] of that which is formerly confuted.
Secondly, The reason whereupon he groundeth his confi∣dent speech, saying, Which place I wonder they can thinke strong enough, is wonderous weake, as it will appeare by the Resolu∣tion, and Answer of his Obiection.
This Argument in forme is,
If all worship of Images is prohibited, Exod. 20. &c. then all making them is also prohibited: for the same Precept, which [ B] saith, Thou shalt not bow downe to them, nor worship them, saith in the former part, Thou shalt not make to thy selfe any grauen Image, &c.
But all making of Images is not prohibited, Exod. 20. Be∣cause Protestants themselues allow some kinde of Image ma∣king, Ergo,
All worship of Images is not prohibited or condemned, Exod. 20, &c. but some kind onely.
Passing by the Assumption, Protestants denie the conse∣quence [ C] of the first Proposition; and to the Proofe thereof, they say, That although some kind and manner of making I∣mages, is forbidden by the Commandement, to wit, such as is intended and prepared for worship: yet all making of Pi∣ctures or Images, to wit, for Historie and Ornament, is not pro∣hibited. But our Aduersarie opposeth this Answer, saying: