A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*

About this Item

Title
A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*
Author
White, Francis, 1564?-1638.
Publication
London :: Printed by Adam Islip,
1624.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Fisher, John, 1569-1641 -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15082.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 24, 2024.

Pages

ANSWER.

Although this Assertion is false, and the Proofe thereof [ E] borrowed from a similie, is impertinent: (for vulgar persons among you, commit grosse Idolatrie in Image Worship, as they which haue liued beyond Seas, and some of your own part report; neither is there the same reason of naturall motion,

Page 246

and the exercise of religious actions:) yet because it serueth [ A] not to prooue the Assumption of your maine Sillogisme, to wit, Protestants cannot assigne any time when Image worship began, &c. I will not insist vpon the examination of it.

The latter branch of this Clause, to wit, Adoration is perfor∣med to Images, as being done outwardly, relatiuely, and transitorily vnto the Image; inwardly, affectuously, absolutely, and finally, vnto Christ, is boldly affirmed, but not confirmed by any Argument.

First, how proue you, by diuine reuelation and testimonie, that adoration is to be performed, according to your distincti∣on of outwardly, relatiuely, and transitorily to Images? And [ B] against such loose and voluntarie presumptions, we say with S. Chrisostome, Diuinae Scripturae testimonia sequamur, neque feramus eos qui timerè quiduis blaterant, we are to follow 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, te∣stimonie of diuine Scripture; and not to regard them, which at rouers, and without ground blatter out what they please.

Secondly, if you adore Images outwardly, relatiuely, and transitorily, then you make Images a partiall obiect of adorati∣on: but God himselfe, who saith, I will not giue my glorie to ano∣ther, (to wit, in whole or in part) neither my praise to grauen Ima∣ges, [ C] (Esa. 42.8.) hath excluded Images from copartnership with himselfe in adoration.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.