Page 223
ANSVVER. [ A]
It is possible for imagination to build castles in the aire, and to conceiue the person of Christ, as present to his Image: yet if this imagination be fantasticall, and if in adoration, Christ and Images haue no agreement, 2. Cor. 6.16. then worshipping of Images, is not worshipping of Christ; for it is possible to imagine God to be in the Sunne, and to behold the Sunne as Gods Image a 1.1, yet they which vpon such an imagination, should worship the Sunne, which God hath not commanded, [ B] must be ranked amongst false worshippers, Deut. 4.19. & 17.3. Iob. 31.26.
And whereas the Obiector addeth, that according to Phi∣losophie, no falshood is in meere apprehension or imaginati∣on b 1.2, without iudging the thing to be, as we imagine. I an∣swer, That this being granted concerning fictions c 1.3, yet vpon such imagination, there may follow, or be inferred that which is false, or morally euill: to wit, if one imagine the Sunne, or a Lambe to be the figure of Christ, and, because in holy Scrip∣tures he is compared to these creatures, Mal. 4.2. Iohn 1.29. [ C] conceiue them as his image, shall it hereupon be lawfull by one and the same motion of the cogitation and affection, to worship the creatures with their Creator?
But that the solution of the former Argument may be more perspicuous, I will present the same in forme, and then applie mine answer. [ D]
If by imagination we may truely conioine Christ himselfe * 1.4 with his Image, then vpon that imagination, we may coworship Christ, and his Image:
But the first may be done, for he being incarnate, may be fi∣gured in the Image of a man, and being thus figured, may be pre∣sented to the vnderstanding, and people may imagine him as pre∣sent, in, or by his Image. Ergo,
Vpon that imagination, we may worship Christ and his Image.
Both the assumpsition, and also the sequel of this Argument, are denied.