A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie.

About this Item

Title
A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie.
Author
Stapleton, Thomas, 1535-1598.
Publication
Louanii :: Apud Ioannem Foulerum. An. 1567. Cum priuil.,
[1567]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Horne, Robert, 1519?-1580. -- Answeare made by Rob. Bishoppe of Wynchester, to a booke entituled, The declaration of suche scruples, and staies of conscience, touchinge the Othe of the Supremacy, as M. John Fekenham, by wrytinge did deliver unto the L. Bishop of Winchester -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Feckenham, John de, 1518?-1585.
Royal supremacy (Church of England) -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A12940.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A12940.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 14, 2024.

Pages

Page 168

M. Horne. The .66. Diuision. pag. 38. a.

VVithin a vvhile after this hon, vvas Agapetus Pope, vvhome The∣odatus the King, sent on his Ambassage vnto the Emperour Iustinianus, to make a suit or treaty in his behalfe. VVhen the Emperour had enterteined this Ambassadour vvith much honour, and graunted that he came for, tou∣ching Theodatus, he earnestly both vvith faire vvordes and soule, assailed this Pope, to bring him to become an Eutychian: the vvhich vvhen he could not vvinne at his handes, being delighted vvith his free speache and con∣stancy, he so liked him, that he foorthvvith (.183.)* 1.1 deposed Anthemius bisshop of Constantinople, bycause he vvas an Eutychian, and placed Men∣na a Catholike man, in his roume. Agapetus died in his legacy, in vvhose roume vvas Syluerius made Pope, by the meanes, or rather, as Sabellicus saieth, by the commaundemente of the Kynge Theodatus, the which vntil this time, was wōt to be done by the authority of the Emperours (saith Sabellicus) for the reuenge whereof Iusti∣nianus was kyndled to make warres against Theodatus. Syl∣uerius vvas shortly after quarrelled vvithal by the Empresse, through the meanes of Vigilius, vvho sought to be in his roome, and vvas by the Empe∣rours (184)* 1.2 authority deposed. The vvhich act although it vver altogether vn∣iust, yet it declareth the autority that the Prince had ouer the Pope: vvho like a good Bisshop, as he vvould not for any threates do contrary to his cōscience and office: so like an (185)* 1.3 obediēt subiect, he acknovvleged the Princes au∣thority: being sent for, came: being accused, vvas ready vvith hūblenes to haue excused and purged him self: and vvhan he could not be admitted thervnto, he suffred him selfe (186)* 1.4 obediētly to be spoiled of the Bissoplike apparaile, to be displaced out of his office, and to be clothed in a Monasticall garement.

The same measure that Vigilius did giue vnto Syluerius, he himselfe being Pope in his place, receiued shortly after, vvith an augmentation, for he vvas in like sorte vvithin a vvhile (187)* 1.5 deposed by the Emperours au∣thority, bicause he vvould not kepe the promise vvhich he had made vnto the Emperesse, and vvas in most cruell vvise dealt vvith all: vvhich cruel∣ty vvas the rather shevved to him by the meanes and procurement (as Sa∣bellicus noteth) of Pelagius, vvhom Vigilius had placed to be his Suf∣fragan in his absence.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.