A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie.

About this Item

Title
A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie.
Author
Stapleton, Thomas, 1535-1598.
Publication
Louanii :: Apud Ioannem Foulerum. An. 1567. Cum priuil.,
[1567]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Horne, Robert, 1519?-1580. -- Answeare made by Rob. Bishoppe of Wynchester, to a booke entituled, The declaration of suche scruples, and staies of conscience, touchinge the Othe of the Supremacy, as M. John Fekenham, by wrytinge did deliver unto the L. Bishop of Winchester -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Feckenham, John de, 1518?-1585.
Royal supremacy (Church of England) -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A12940.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A12940.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 14, 2024.

Pages

M. Horne. The .55. Diuision. Pag 33. b.

This Synode being finished, the Emperour banished Dioscorus into the Cytie of Gangren. VVhich thyng doon: The noles of the Cytie (saith Liberats) assēbled together to choose one, both for life and learning, worthy of the Bisshopricke: for this wa (.156.)* 1.1 cōmaunded by the Emperours Decrees. At the length Poteriu v••••s ade Bishop: against vvhom the seditious people raysed one imo∣theus Helluus, or Aelurus, vvho in conclusion, murthered Proterius. The catholique Bissoppes, vvhich mainteined the Chalcedon councel, made humble supplication vnto Leo the Emperour, both to reuenge the death of Proterius, and also (.157)* 1.2 to depose Timotheus Hellurus, as one not Lavvfully instituted in the Bishoprike on the contrary parte, other Bishops make supplication vto hm, in the defence of Timotheus, and against the Chalcedon councel. VVhen Leo the Emperour had considered the mat∣ter of both their supplications, for good and godly consyderations he vvrote his letters to the Bisshops of euery city, declaring both these causes, and vvil∣ling them to send him (.158)* 1.3 their aduise, vvhat vvas best to be done: from vvhom he receiued anvvere, that the Chalcedon Councel is to be maintei∣ned euen vnto eath: vvherevpon the Emperour vvriteth to Sila his Lieu∣tenaunt of Alexandria, that he should maintein the Chalceon Coun∣cell. Stila did as the Emperour commaunded: he expelled Timotheus Hellurus, and (.159.)* 1.4 placed an other in his roume, named Timotheus Slefacialius, or Albus, vvho liued quietly all he raigne of Leo, and Zeno, the Emperours, til Basilicus gat the Empire, vvho restored Timo∣theus the Heretique: But vvhen Zeno recouered the Empire, this Timo∣theus poisoned him selfe, in vvhose place the Heretiques chose one Peter Mogge. Afer that Zeno the Emperour knevv of the crafty dealing of the heretiques, he vvrote to his Lieuenaunt Anthemius, that he should de∣priue Peter Mogge, and restore Timotheus to the bisshopricke, and fur∣ther, that he should punish those, that vvere the authours to enstall Peter

Page 155

Mogge. Anthemius receiuing the mperours mandate, did depose Peter Mogge, as one that vvas but a counterfayt made bissop, contrary to the lavv∣es of the Catholique Churche, and restored Timotheus Salefacialius, vvho being restored, sent certeine of his Clergy to the Emperour to render him thankes.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.