A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie.

About this Item

Title
A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie.
Author
Stapleton, Thomas, 1535-1598.
Publication
Louanii :: Apud Ioannem Foulerum. An. 1567. Cum priuil.,
[1567]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Horne, Robert, 1519?-1580. -- Answeare made by Rob. Bishoppe of Wynchester, to a booke entituled, The declaration of suche scruples, and staies of conscience, touchinge the Othe of the Supremacy, as M. John Fekenham, by wrytinge did deliver unto the L. Bishop of Winchester -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Feckenham, John de, 1518?-1585.
Royal supremacy (Church of England) -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A12940.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A12940.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 14, 2024.

Pages

Page 131

M. Horne. The 45. Diuision. Pag. 30. a.

Eutyches stirred vp much trouble in these daies: vvherefore he vvas cited to appeare before Flauianus Bisshop of Constantinople, and other Bisshops assembled in a Synode, to ansvveare vnto his heresies: vvho vvoulde * 1.1 not appeare but fledde vnto the Emperour Theodosius, and declareth vnto him his griefe. The Emperour sendeth vnto the Synod vvith Eutiches, one of his chiefe officers Florentius, vvith this mandate: Bicause wee study carefully for the peace of Goddes Churche, and for the Catho¦like Faith, and wil by Goddes grace haue the righte Faithe kepte, whiche was sette foorth by the Nicene Councell, and confirmed by the Fathers at Ephesus, when Nestorius was cō∣demned: wee wil therefore there bee no offence committed aboute the aforenamed Catholique Faithe, and bicause wee knowe the honourable Florentius, to be a faithfull and an ap∣prooued man in the righte faith, wee wil that he shalbe pre∣sent in your Synode, bicause the conference is of the Faithe. He vvas there asistaunt vnto the Fathers and (.132.)* 1.2 examined Eutyches openly in the Synode, (.133.)* 1.3 diuerse times of his faithe, and finally saide vnto him: He that (saithe Florentius) doth not confesse in Christ twoo natures, doth not beleeue aright: and (.134.)* 1.4 so vvas Eutyches ex∣communicate, deposed, and condemned. Eutyches rested not here, but ob∣teined that the Emperour did commaunde a nevv Synode to be had at Con∣stantinople, vvherein to examine the actes of the former, vvhether that all thinges touching the proceding against Eutyches, vvere don orderly and rightly, or no. He appointeth besides Florentius, diuerse (.135.)* 1.5 other of his nobles to be in this councel, to see the doings thereof. But vvhen Eutyches coulde not vvin his purpose in neither of these Synodes, he procureth by friēd∣ship of the Empresse Eudoxia and others, that the Emperour should call a Synode againe at Ephesus: to the vvhich Synode the Emperour prescribeth a fourme of proceding. This Synode vvas a vvicked conuenticle, vvherein the truth vvas defaced and Heresie approued, the Emperour being seduced by Chrysaphius, one of the priuy chamber, and in most fauour vvithe him.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.