Page 54
A Comparison of M. Cato, and Ca. Caesar.
IN discent, in yeares, and eloquence they were almost equall: in greatnesse of mind and popu∣ler commendation alike, but diuersly. Caesar affected the Sir-name of Great, by Largesse & Bountie. Cato by Integritie of life. Caesar became famous for his curtesie and gentlenesse; Cato for his sterne carri∣age and seuerity. Caesar grew popular by giuing, by forgi∣uing, by releeuing: Cato by contraries. The one profest refuge to the oppressed: the other, inexorable to offen∣ders. The one was praised for affability: the other for gra∣uity. Caesars chiefest felicity was, to labor, to watch, to pre∣fer the ••uits of his fauourites, to be careles of his own, to deny nothing worth giuing: of cōmand, of Soldiery, of difficult wars (wherein valor and good conduct shewed the man) very desirous: But Catoes studies were modesty, graue carriage, and aboue all, seuerity. With the rich, he contended not for Riches, neither with the factious, for followers; but with the valourous, by imitation: with the modest, in Conscience, and with the good man, in absti∣nence. He coueted to be, not to seem. The lesse he sought praise, the more it followed him. Thus much for this: