Many bee the aduersaries one way, or other crossing this truth. For
1. Some condemne all swearing, as did the Esseis, who deeme all swearing as bad as forswearing a 1.1; and doe the A∣nabaptistes, which will not sweare, albeit thereby both the glorie of God may bee much promoted, and the Church of Christ▪ or Common-weale, furthered b 1.2.
2. Others condemne some kind of Oathes, and will not sweare, though vrged by the magistrate, but when themselues thinke good. So the Papistes, no man (say they) ought to take an Oath to accuse a Catholicke (a Papist) for his religion c 1.3; & such as by Oathes accuse Catholickes (that is Papists) are damned d 1.4.
So the Puritans, oftentimes either will take none oath at all when it is ministred vnto them by authoritie, if it may turne to the molestation of their Brethren e 1.5, or if they sweare (find∣ing their testimonie will bee hurtfull to their cause) they wil not deliuer their mindes after they be sworne f 1.6.
3. Others, hauing taken the Oath doe fowlie abuse the same, as the Knights of the post, like the Turkish Seiti, & Chagi g 1.7, who for a Ducket will take a thousand false Oathes afore the magistrate; as also the Iesuits, who in swearing (which is little better then forswearing) doe vti scientia, that is cunning, and equiuocations h 1.8; as also doe they, who conscionablie, and religiouslie keepe not their faith, such are the forenamed Pa∣pistes. For (say they) An Oath taken for the furtherance of false religion (as they take the profession of all Protestantes to be i 1.9) bindeth not k 1.10. Againe, Faith is not to bee kept with Haeritickes l 1.11. Which assertion little differeth from the opinion of some Puritanes, who teach▪ that promise (or Faith) is not