312 Negatiua preg∣nans.
NEgatiua pregnans, is when an action or in∣formation, or such lyke is brought against one, & the defendant pleadeth in barre of the action, or o∣therwise, a negatiue plée, which is not so speciall
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
NEgatiua pregnans, is when an action or in∣formation, or such lyke is brought against one, & the defendant pleadeth in barre of the action, or o∣therwise, a negatiue plée, which is not so speciall
an aunswere to the action, but that it includeth also an affirmatiue: As for ex∣ample: If in a writte of Entre in casu prouiso, brought by him in the re∣uersion vpon alienation by the tenant for life, suppo∣sing that hée hath aliened in fée (which is a forfai∣ture of his estate) and the tenant to the writte say∣eth that hee hath not alie∣ned in fee, this is a nega∣tiue, wherein is inclu∣ded an affirmatiue: for al∣though it bée true, that he hath not aliened in fée, yet it may bée that hée hath made an estate in tayle (which is also a forfai∣ture) and then the entrie of him in the reuersion is lawfull &c.
Also in a Quare impedit the Quéene makes title to present to a Prebend, for that the temporalties of the Bishopricke we••e in her handes by the death of w. late Bishop▪ &c. The defendant saith that it was not voyde béeing the Temporalties in the Quéenes handes by the death of w. this is a
Negatiue preignans, for it may be in y• Quéens hāds otherwise then by the death of w. and it sufficeth the Quéen if it be in her hāds by any meanes &c.
So it is where an In∣formation was brought in the Eschequer against I. S. for that he bought wooll betwene shering time and the Assumptiō such a yere of I. N. The defendant saith that he did not buy a∣nie of I. N. as it is allead∣ged &c. this is called a Ne∣gatiue preignans, for it hee bought it o•• anie other, yet he is culpable for the buy∣ing.