of whom the Arke was taken. The Tabernacle, in the time of Saul, was carried to
Nob, and, in the time of Dauid, to Gibeon, where Salomon offered a thousand burnt
offerings. The Philistims forced by Diuine iudgements, sent backe the Arke, receiued
by the Bethsamites, curious to their cost, it was after placed in Kiriath-Iarim, in the
house of Aminadab, next of Obed-Edam, and then by Dauid in the place, which he
had fitted for the same in Ierusalem; whence it was remoued into the Temple, which
Salomon had built: where it was till the time of the deportation: in which time
it was
hidden by Ieremie the Prophet. But that Author is beholden to the Councell of Trent
for his credit, the Iewes themselues in that point, not beleeuing him;
who affirme,
that the second Temple came short of the former, by the want of the fire from heauen, of
the Arke, of the Vrim and Thummim, of the succession of Prophets, and the glorie of God
betweene the Cherubims.
The Temple was built on Mount Moriah by Salomon, according to the
paterne,
which he had receiued of Dauid: to which worke he had gathered a greater masse of
wealth, then easily we shall reade of in the Persian, Greeke, Roman, or any other Chri∣stian,
Turkish, or Heathen Empire;
namely, 100000. talents of gold; 1000000. ta∣lents
of siluer, and afterward 3000, talents of gold, and 7000. talents of siluer: to
which was added, by the offerings of the Princes, 10000. talents of siluer, and more
then 5000. talents of gold, besides iewels, and brasse, and iron, without weight, with
Cedars and stones without number. The gold alone amounteth after the common
computation of the common talent, at 6000. crownes, to sixe hundred fortie eight
millions of crownes, and vpwards; the siluer to about the same summe.
This beautifull frame I should deforme with my description, if (after a double narration
of all the parts; forme, and contents thereof in the Historie of the Bible) I
should recite the particulars. This Temple, fleeced by some, repaired by others, con∣tinued
in varietie of state, till the sacking and ruine of it, together with the Citie by
Nabuchodonosor. And after their returne, by the edict of Cyrus, and other the Persian
Kings, it was rebuilded (but farre inferiour in glorie) in the space, as the Iewes say,
vnto Christ, of six and fortie yeares: after others it was longer in hand, by reason of
impediments from their cauilling, and malicious neighbours. This second Temple ha∣uing
receiued accesse of magnificence in succession of times, was spoiled and polluted
vnder Antiochus, who dedicated the same to Iupiter Olympius; but being freed and
dedicated anew by Maccabaeus, it recouered great part of the former beautie; till as
Iosephus saith, and his abbreuiator Iosippus, it was pulled downe by Herod, and built
anew. Herein both that allegation of the Iewes of sixe and fortie yeares, is against this
assertion of Iosephus, and the Historie also of Hegesippus
who reporteth that he only
compassed the circuit about the Temple with a wall, and beautified the same with
costly buildings, erected from the foundation the porches about the Sanctuarie, and
fortified it with the castle Antonia.
Chrysostome
vnderstands those words, of the Iewes, Forty and sixe yeares was this
Temple a building, of the Herodian, Temple: and herein
Hospinian, and the great Car∣dinall
Baronius follow him: accounting exclusiuely from the eighteenth yeare of He∣rods
reigne, which Functins reckoneth A. M. 3947. to the yeare 3992. in which Iohn
Baptised, and CHRIST vttered these words: in all which they coniecture that
somewhat was still a doing about the new building thereof, although the principall
part thereof was performed and finished by Herod in eight yeares. This they gather
by Iosephus his owne testimonie, that the building continued till the time of Nero,
and in an other place, where he affirmeth that the East porch, which Luke cals
Sa∣lomons
porch, was still remaining of the ancient building, in the dayes of Nero, and
elsewhere, that Herod repaired the Temple.
Iosephus is therefore herein contrarie
to the truth, and himselfe. Neither doe the Iewes in the Talmud speake of any third
Temple: nor can the Prophecie of
Haggaus bee fulfilled, that the glorie of the se∣cond
Temple should exceed the glorie of the former; if CHRIST (of whose comming it
is interpreted) had not by his presence, preaching, and miracles, not onely supplied
the defects (before mentioned) but made it surmount the other in effects of Maiestie