I. Our consent.
Freewill both by them and vs, is taken for a mixt power in the minde and will of man: whereby discerning what is good and what is euill, he doth ac∣cordingly choose or refuse the same.
I. Conclus. Man must be considered in a foure-fold estate, as he was created, as he was corrupted, as he is renewed, as he shalbe glorified. In the first estate, we ascribe to mans will libertie of nature in which he could will or ••ill either good or euill: in the third, libertie of grace: in the last libertie of glorie. All the doubt is of the second estate: and yet therein also we agree, as the conclusions following will declare.
II. Conclus. The matters where about freewill is occupied are principally the actions of men, which be of three sorts; naturall, humane, spirituall. Natu∣rall actions are such as are cōmon to men with beasts, as to eate, drink, sleepe, heare, see, smell, tast, and to mooue from place to place: in all which we ioyne with the Papists, and hold that man hath freewil, and euen since the fall of A∣dam by naturall power of the mind doth freely performe any of these actions or the like.
III. Conclus. Humane actions are such as are common to all men good & bad, as to speake and vse reason, the practise of all mechanicall and liberal arts, and the outward performance of Ciuill and Ecclesiasticall duties, as to come to the Church, to speake and preach the word, to reach out the hand to re∣ceiue the Sacrament, and to lend the eare to listen outwardly to that which is taught. And hither we may referre the outward actions of ciuill vertues; as namely Iustice, temperance, gentlenes, liberalitie. And in these also we ioyne with the Church of Rome, and say (as experience teacheth) that men haue a naturall freedome of will, to put them or not to put them in execution. Paul saith, Rom. 2.14. The Gentiles that haue not the law doe the things of the law by nature, that is, by natural strength: and he saith of himselfe, that before his con∣uersion touching the righteousnes of the law, he was vnblameable, Phil. 3. 6. And for this externall obedience, naturall men receiue reward in temporall things. Matth. 6.5. Ezech. 29.19. And yet here some caueats must be remem∣bred: I. that in humane actions, mans will is weake and feeble, and his vnder∣standing dimme and darke; and thereupon he often failes in them. And in all such actions with Augustine I vnderstand the will of man to be onely woun∣ded or halfe dead. II. That the will of man is vnder the will of God, and ther∣fore to be ordered by it: as Ieremie saith, chap. 10.23. O Lord, I know that the way of man is not in himselfe, neither is in man to walke or direct his steppes.
IV. Conclus. The third kind of actions are spirituall more neerely concer∣ning the heart or conscience, and these be two-fold: they either concerne the kingdome of darknes, or els the kingdome of God. Those that concerne the kingdome of darknes are sinnes properly: and in these we likewise ioyne with the Papists and teach, that in sinnes or euill actions man hath freedome of wil. Some peraduenture will say, that we sinne necessarily, because he that sinneth cannot but sinne: and that freewill & necessitie cannot stand together. Indeed