The Catholicke Deuine.
30. The first case of this instance about tithes and probates of testaments, * 1.1 is a verie trifling thing to proue M. Attorneys great cōclusion, of supreme authoritie Ecclesiasticall to be in the tem∣porall Prince & his Courts. For as these things, and like other, are in parte belonging to spirituall iurisdiction, in that they con∣cerne benefices; the willes and ordinations of dead men for the benefit of their soules, & the like, partlie also belonging to tem∣porall, * 1.2 in that they include temporalities & worldly substance, they may in different respects appertaine also to differēt Courts, and so they doe in other Catholicke Countreys at this day: and namelie for probates of testaments, in no other Countrey (per∣haps) besides England, are they limited onlie to the Bishops spi∣rituall Courts. About which wee haue the foresaid Statutes of Circumspectè agatis vnder K. Edward the first, and of Articuli Cleri vnder K. Edward the 2. and diuers other Ordinations vnder this King Edward the 3. But how proueth all this M. Attorneys princi∣pall conclusion? And how far of is this from inferring supreme Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction to be in the temporall Prince? Is it not strange, that such a man as M. Attorney, would alleadge such toyes? But let vs goe forward.
31. If K. Edward did translate by his Charter, the Canons se∣cular