of Hippocrates ought not to be followed, who sai∣eth, that all contused wounds ought to be broght to suppuration, because (sayth he) this is a new di∣sease, and vnknowne to the Ancients, and there∣fore it requireth new remedies. Also that thunder and the violent effect thereof, ought not to bee compared to the reports of Artillery.
Now seeing that he striueth to contradict all that I haue written before in my book of wounds made by Gunne-shot, Arrowes▪ and Dartes, I am constrained for my defence, to repeate somewhat of that which I haue heeretofore divulged, to re∣proue all these points (as I hope) one after ano∣ther.
First of all, that suppuratiue Medicines are not proper in such wounds, it is against reason, autho∣rity, and experience: for euery one knoweth that the Bullet being round and massiue, cannot make any entrance into our bodies, without great con∣tusion and bruising; the which cannot bee cured without suppuration, according to the authority not onely of Hippocrates, but also of Galen, and all other Authors both Ancient and Moderne. And what doth it serue him to call such new woundes, to derogate from the saying of Hippocrates whom we hold to be the Father, Author, and Founder of the Lawes of sacred Medicine, which are wor∣thy of all esteeme and praise aboue all others, be∣cause they are not subiect to change, as all others that are established by Kings and Princes, ney∣ther are they tied to the prescription of times, nor