The answere.
[ 1] I say first, that the contrary illation, is more fitly gathered out of Saint Iohns assertion; albeit the papistes thinke this
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
[ 1] I say first, that the contrary illation, is more fitly gathered out of Saint Iohns assertion; albeit the papistes thinke this
a bulwarke, for their iustification by good works. For when he saith, he that doth iustice, is iust, it is all one as if he had said, when one doth good works, it is a signe that he is iust, because none can do good works, vnlesse hee be iust. For as a tree can∣not bring forth good fruit, vnlesse it first be good; euen so cannot any man do good works vnles he first be the child of god. The reason is euident, bicause the effect must folow, & not go before the cause. For as saint Austen grauely saith;* 1.1 Opera sequuntur iustificatum, non praecedunt iustificandum. Works follow him that is alreadie iustified, but they goe not before him that is to be iustified. I say secondly, that hee that doth iustice, is iust by [ 2] inherent iustice, but imperfectly, as is alreadie prooued.
August. de fid. & ope. ca. 14. tom. 4