The answer.
I say first that no saint did or can suffer so much as is suffici∣ent [ 1] for his sinnes. And I prooue it euidently, because the best learned papists graunt freely and truely, that euery mortall sin hath in it infinite deformitie, as which is an auersion from God of infinite maiestie, and consequently that God requireth infinite satisfaction for the same: yet so it is that pure man is vncapable of euery infinit action (for otherwise he should be an other God;) and consequently, mans actions of which no one among all can be infinite, can not yeeld condigne compensation for one only mortall sin: and yet is euery sin mortall indeed, as I haue prooued in my Motiues, euen by popish doctrine. Per∣vse the eight article of Dissention in the second Booke of the said Motiues, and thou shalt see euidently, that not only Ger∣son, Durand, Baius, Roffensis, and Almayn (who al were renow∣med papists) but euen the common schooles of late dayes doe holde the same opinion.
I say secondly, that God hath alreadie rewarded euerie saint [ 2] in heauen, (as he will also in time rewarde euerie saint nowe on earth) f••r aboue their deserts. Which I prooue briefly by these two reasons: first, because S. Paul so teacheth vs, when he saith that the sufferings of this life,* 1.1 are not worthy of the glory to come. Which saying I haue answered at large in