The suruey of popery vvherein the reader may cleerely behold, not onely the originall and daily incrementes of papistrie, with an euident confutation of the same; but also a succinct and profitable enarration of the state of Gods Church from Adam vntill Christs ascension, contained in the first and second part thereof: and throughout the third part poperie is turned vp-side downe.

About this Item

Title
The suruey of popery vvherein the reader may cleerely behold, not onely the originall and daily incrementes of papistrie, with an euident confutation of the same; but also a succinct and profitable enarration of the state of Gods Church from Adam vntill Christs ascension, contained in the first and second part thereof: and throughout the third part poperie is turned vp-side downe.
Author
Bell, Thomas, fl. 1593-1610.
Publication
London :: Printed by Valentine Sims dwelling on Adling hill at the signe of the white Swanne,
1596.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A07919.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The suruey of popery vvherein the reader may cleerely behold, not onely the originall and daily incrementes of papistrie, with an euident confutation of the same; but also a succinct and profitable enarration of the state of Gods Church from Adam vntill Christs ascension, contained in the first and second part thereof: and throughout the third part poperie is turned vp-side downe." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A07919.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 13, 2024.

Pages

The first conclusion.

* 1.1The first general councel of Nice, (in which Arrius denying the consubstantialitie of the son of God, was condemned,) was not celebrated by the Popes appointment, (who in those daies was reputed but as other bishops;) but by the flat and expresse commandement of the Emperor Constantinus surnamed the Great, in the yere 327. This I do not barely say, but I will prooue the same after my wonted manner, by the expresse testi∣monies of approued Historiographers.* 1.2

* 1.3Al the fathers assembled in the sacred councel of Nice, wrote to the church of Alexandria, and to the inhabitants of Egypt, Lybia, and Pentapolis, in this expresse maner: Quoniam dei gratia & mandato sanctissimi Imperatoris Constantini, qui

Page 519

nos ex varijs ciuitatibus & prouincijs in vnum congregauit, magnum & sanctum concilium Nicaenum coactum est necessariū videtur, &c. Because through the grace of God, and by the commandement of the most holy Emperor Constantine, who hath gathered vs together out of diuerse cities, and prouinces, the great and holy councel of Nice is assembled: it seemeth necessary, that the whole councell send letters to you; by which ye may vnderstād, aswel those things that were called into que¦stiō, as the things that are decided & decreed in the same. Thus writeth Socrates. Out of these words I note first; that this te∣stimonie [ 1] is of greatest credit without al exception, as which was not published by one or two, but by more then three hun∣dred bishops as writeth Nicephorus,* 1.4 who were the most vertu∣ous & learned priests in the christian worlde. I note secondly, [ 2] these holy fathers, of this famous councel, doe not once name the Pope in their letters; so far were they in these daies, frō as∣cribing the chiefe prerogatiue in councels, to the B. of Rome. I note thirdly, that al the councel confesseth in their ioynt let∣ters [ 3] as we see, that the councel was called by the emperor, and that they all were assembled together by his commandement. Where I wish the reader, to obserue diligently the word (Cō∣mandement:* 1.5) for if the emperor did not cal coūcels together by his own authority, but by the popes, as the papists prate; then could not this holy councel truely say, as al the fathers thereof constantly do say, to wit, that they came thither by the Empe∣rours commandement. I note fourthly, that none in the world [ 4] can better tell how the councell was called, then the fathers of the councel, who were the persons called; and yet do they ioyne the emperors commandement with the grace of God, and ex∣clude the Pope altogether.

Theodoret▪ hath these words: Ʋerum vbi spes eum fefellerat,* 1.6 celebre illud Nicaenum concilium cogit, & publicos asinos, mu∣las, & mulos, quinetiam equos episcopis & comitibus suis ad iter faciendum vtendos dat.

Sozom. hath these words: Verū vbi contra quàm expectabat,* 1.7 res succederet, & contentio reconciliationem concordiae, &c. But after the matter succeeded otherwise then he expected, & reconciliation was hindered with contention; and Hosius also sent to make peace, returned leauing ye thing vndone; ye empe∣ror

Page 524

appointeth a councel at Nice a city in Bythinia, & writeth to the presidents of al churches to be presēt at a day appointed.

* 1.8Niceph. hath these words: Infectis reb. ad imperatorē rediit, qui ad pacem componendam missus fuerat, Hosius. Ita{que} impera∣tor, &c. Hosius that was sent to make peace, returned to the Emperour, not hauing accomplished the matter. Therfore the Emperour perceiuing the mischife to grow to a head, doth pro∣clame the famous councel of Nice in Bythinia, and by his let∣ters calleth al bishops thither at the day appointed. Thus wee see euidently by the vniforme testimonie of foure graue Histo∣riographers, whereof three liued more then a 1100. yeares a∣go: that the bishop of Rome had no more to do in general coun∣cels, then other bishops had. First, they tel vs, that the Empe∣rour sent Hosius the bishop of Corduba,* 1.9 to bring the contenti∣ous to vnitie. Secondly, when that would not take place, that hee proclaimed a councell to bee holden at Nice in Bythinia. Thirdly, that he cōmanded al bishops to come thither at a cer∣tain day apointed. But of the B. of Rome, neuer a word at al.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.