of name in the Councell of Trent) Fisher Bishop of Rochester, and Hes∣sell. But how prove They this? Out of any of the works of Au∣gustine? No, where then? Wee are required to seeke it in Pro∣sper; where againe it is not to be found. Whither next? for∣sooth it is so cited by Peter Lombard, and there it appeareth that Peter Lombard had it out of his supposed Brother Grati∣an; wee say, Gratian, whose bookes have beene lately repro∣ved, and condemned by one of your Arch-bishops, for many False allegations of Testimonies of Fathers. And when all is done, if either Peter-Lombard or Gratian, who are the Relators, may be admitted to be the Interpreters of that coyned Sentence, they will say that the word Flesh, there specified, is taken for the Shape of flesh; and the word Blood, for the outward forme of Blood; which spoyleth your Play quite: wherein you will have the Flesh of Christ under the outward formes and shape in this Sacrament, and not the outward formes and shape themselves, to be the Signe of the same Body on the Crosse. So easie it is for Hunters to pursue their Game with loud cries upon a false sent.
Wee returne to your Cardinall, and to Suarez, who invented the Similitvde of the Stage-Play for their Answere, which is indeed rather a Childish Playing, then Theologicall reasoning; yet it is but a mad sport to argue against Conscience; as this your Cardi∣nall must needs have done, who confessing that the Greeke Fathers did therefore call Sacraments, Antitypes, because of the great Simili∣tude they have with the things they represent; yet now adventureth to say, that the Body of Christ, as it is in the Eucharist, is a Signe of the same Body of Christ, as it was upon the Crosse; notwithstan∣ding the Body of Christ, as it is in the Sacrament, (according to your owne faith) is so Invisible, that it cannot be seene of Angels; so Indivisible, that it cannot be parted or divided; and so Vn∣bloody, that there is not the least tincture of blood to be discer∣ned therein.
Wherfore to perswade your Disciples, that those grave Fathers ever taught that the Invisible, Indivisible, and Vnbloody Body of Christ, as in this Sacrament, was or could be the Signe of his visible, torne, crucified and bloody Body vpon the Crosse, and so to note an Antitype, which is (as you call it) the Greatest Similitude, is all one, as to find out the greatest Similitude in the greatest Dissimili∣tude: which yet is the more intollerable, because it is against the Confessed Common opinion of your owne Divines, who haue taught that The Sacrament of the Eucharist is called Type and Anti∣type, because of the formes of Bread and Wine. So your Billius. Ma•• you not now discerne the notable perversnesse of your Dispu∣ters,