Of the institution of the sacrament of the blessed bodie and blood of Christ, (by some called) the masse of Christ eight bookes; discovering the superstitious, sacrilegious, and idolatrous abominations of the Romish masse. Together with the consequent obstinacies, overtures of perjuries, and the heresies discernable in the defenders thereof. By the R. Father in God Thomas L. Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield.

About this Item

Title
Of the institution of the sacrament of the blessed bodie and blood of Christ, (by some called) the masse of Christ eight bookes; discovering the superstitious, sacrilegious, and idolatrous abominations of the Romish masse. Together with the consequent obstinacies, overtures of perjuries, and the heresies discernable in the defenders thereof. By the R. Father in God Thomas L. Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield.
Author
Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659.
Publication
London :: Printed by W. Stansby, for Robert Mylbourne in Pauls Church-yard at the signe of the Grey-hound,
MDCXXXI. [1631]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Mass -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A07812.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Of the institution of the sacrament of the blessed bodie and blood of Christ, (by some called) the masse of Christ eight bookes; discovering the superstitious, sacrilegious, and idolatrous abominations of the Romish masse. Together with the consequent obstinacies, overtures of perjuries, and the heresies discernable in the defenders thereof. By the R. Father in God Thomas L. Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A07812.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 5, 2024.

Pages

A SECOND CHALLENGE,

Against the last, and most peremptory Romish Pretence, ma∣king Christ in this Sacrament to figure, and to represent himselfe, as a King in a Stage-play.

THe Solution, which seemeth to your Disputers most perswa∣sive, is thus set downe by your Cardinall, and your Iesuite Suarez, viz. c 1.1 The Greeke Fathers called Bread and Wine Antitypes and Signes of the Body and Blood of Christ, because the same Body and Blood of Christ, as they are in this Sacrament vnder the forme of Bread and Wine, are signes of the same his Body and Blood, as they were on the Crosse. Like as a King, who having gotten a victory in battell, should represent himselfe in a Stage-Play, as in a fight. So They. But with∣out any Sentence of any Father, for countenancing so egregious a figment; so farre were those Greeke Fathers from urging that counterfeit Testimony, which passeth vnder the name of S. Au∣gustine, as if hee had said; The flesh of Christ is a Sacrament of his flesh: and inferring from hence, that The Body of Christ, as it is in this Sacrament, is a Signe of it selfe as it was upon the Crosse.

And they are no small Babes, who vent out this proofe; by name d 1.2 Billius, Gardiner Bishop of Winchester, Claudius Sainctes (one

Page 91

of name in the Councell of Trent) Fisher Bishop of Rochester, and Hes∣sell. But how prove They this? Out of any of the works of Au∣gustine? No, where then? Wee are required to seeke it in Pro∣sper; where againe e 1.3 it is not to be found. Whither next? for∣sooth it is so cited by Peter Lombard, and there it appeareth that Peter Lombard had it out of his supposed Brother Grati∣an; wee say, Gratian, whose bookes have beene lately repro∣ved, and condemned by one of your f 1.4 Arch-bishops, for many False allegations of Testimonies of Fathers. And when all is done, if either g 1.5 Peter-Lombard or h 1.6 Gratian, who are the Relators, may be admitted to be the Interpreters of that coyned Sentence, they will say that the word Flesh, there specified, is taken for the Shape of flesh; and the word Blood, for the outward forme of Blood; which spoyleth your Play quite: wherein you will have the Flesh of Christ under the outward formes and shape in this Sacrament, and not the outward formes and shape themselves, to be the Signe of the same Body on the Crosse. So easie it is for Hunters to pursue their Game with loud cries upon a false sent.

Wee returne to your Cardinall, and to Suarez, who invented the Similitvde of the Stage-Play for their Answere, which is indeed rather a Childish Playing, then Theologicall reasoning; yet it is but a mad sport to argue against Conscience; as this your Cardi∣nall must needs have done, who i 1.7 confessing that the Greeke Fathers did therefore call Sacraments, Antitypes, because of the great Simili∣tude they have with the things they represent; yet now adventureth to say, that the Body of Christ, as it is in the Eucharist, is a Signe of the same Body of Christ, as it was upon the Crosse; notwithstan∣ding the Body of Christ, as it is in the Sacrament, (according to your owne faith) is so k 1.8 Invisible, that it cannot be seene of Angels; so Indivisible, that it cannot be parted or divided; and so Vn∣bloody, that there is not the least tincture of blood to be discer∣ned therein.

Wherfore to perswade your Disciples, that those grave Fathers ever taught that the Invisible, Indivisible, and Vnbloody Body of Christ, as in this Sacrament, was or could be the Signe of his visible, torne, crucified and bloody Body vpon the Crosse, and so to note an Antitype, which is (as you call it) the l 1.9 Greatest Similitude, is all one, as to find out the greatest Similitude in the greatest Dissimili∣tude: which yet is the more intollerable, because it is against the Confessed m 1.10 Common opinion of your owne Divines, who haue taught that The Sacrament of the Eucharist is called Type and Anti∣type, because of the formes of Bread and Wine. So your Billius. Ma you not now discerne the notable perversnesse of your Dispu∣ters,

Page 92

and that they devised this Stage-Play, ad faciendum Populum, to please and delude their Readers? thereby to fit themselves the better for the Pageant; whereof we shall be occasioned to say more in the * 1.11 sixt Booke.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.