Of the institution of the sacrament of the blessed bodie and blood of Christ, (by some called) the masse of Christ eight bookes; discovering the superstitious, sacrilegious, and idolatrous abominations of the Romish masse. Together with the consequent obstinacies, overtures of perjuries, and the heresies discernable in the defenders thereof. By the R. Father in God Thomas L. Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield.

About this Item

Title
Of the institution of the sacrament of the blessed bodie and blood of Christ, (by some called) the masse of Christ eight bookes; discovering the superstitious, sacrilegious, and idolatrous abominations of the Romish masse. Together with the consequent obstinacies, overtures of perjuries, and the heresies discernable in the defenders thereof. By the R. Father in God Thomas L. Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield.
Author
Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659.
Publication
London :: Printed by W. Stansby, for Robert Mylbourne in Pauls Church-yard at the signe of the Grey-hound,
MDCXXXI. [1631]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Mass -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A07812.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Of the institution of the sacrament of the blessed bodie and blood of Christ, (by some called) the masse of Christ eight bookes; discovering the superstitious, sacrilegious, and idolatrous abominations of the Romish masse. Together with the consequent obstinacies, overtures of perjuries, and the heresies discernable in the defenders thereof. By the R. Father in God Thomas L. Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A07812.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 6, 2024.

Pages

Our first Reason is taken from the due Perfection of this Sacra∣ment, which must necessarily be in both kindes.

The things Spirituall (as all Christians professe) are the Body and Blood of Christ, which are signified in the Sacrament of Bread and wine; These two then are not two Sacraments, but one Sacrament, (as you know) which therfore ought to be performed in both, or els the Act will be a Sacrilegious dismembring of the Sacrament of Christ. This shall we easily prove from the Principles and Confes∣sions of your owne Schooles. Your Church professeth to celebrate the Eucharist, both as it is a Sacrifice, and as it is a Sacrament. As you hold it to be a Sacrifice, you generaly teach that both kinds are neces∣sarily to be received of the Priest, because they both belong to the Essence thereof. So your l 1.1 Cardinall. Consult with your m 1.2 Aquinas, your Iesuites Valentia, and Vasques, and they will say as much in behalfe of the Eucharist, as it is a Sacrament; their reason is, Because both kindes, making but one Sacrament, ought to be celebrated perfectly, and therefore is the Priest bound to consecrate this Sacrament in both kindes by that command of Christ, saying, [Do this:] nor can this be omitted without Sacrilege. So they.

If such be the necessity of consecrating in both kindes vnder the hand of the Priest, then lieth the same obligation vpon the Church likewise, for distributing it in both kindes vnto the people, to whom it is to be administred, in token of Christ his Passion for them applicatorily, both in his Body and Blood: but the Bread only can no

Page 55

more represent the Blood of Christ in the mouthes of people, in the eating thereof, then it can by Consecrating it in the hands of the Priest: and consequently the dismembring thereof, as you do, must necessarily condemne both Priest and People. A Consequence, which your figment of * 1.3 Concomitancie cannot possibly auoid.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.