Our first Reason is taken from the due Perfection of this Sacra∣ment, which must necessarily be in both kindes.
The things Spirituall (as all Christians professe) are the Body and Blood of Christ, which are signified in the Sacrament of Bread and wine; These two then are not two Sacraments, but one Sacrament, (as you know) which therfore ought to be performed in both, or els the Act will be a Sacrilegious dismembring of the Sacrament of Christ. This shall we easily prove from the Principles and Confes∣sions of your owne Schooles. Your Church professeth to celebrate the Eucharist, both as it is a Sacrifice, and as it is a Sacrament. As you hold it to be a Sacrifice, you generaly teach that both kinds are neces∣sarily to be received of the Priest, because they both belong to the Essence thereof. So your l 1.1 Cardinall. Consult with your m 1.2 Aquinas, your Iesuites Valentia, and Vasques, and they will say as much in behalfe of the Eucharist, as it is a Sacrament; their reason is, Because both kindes, making but one Sacrament, ought to be celebrated perfectly, and therefore is the Priest bound to consecrate this Sacrament in both kindes by that command of Christ, saying, [Do this:] nor can this be omitted without Sacrilege. So they.
If such be the necessity of consecrating in both kindes vnder the hand of the Priest, then lieth the same obligation vpon the Church likewise, for distributing it in both kindes vnto the people, to whom it is to be administred, in token of Christ his Passion for them applicatorily, both in his Body and Blood: but the Bread only can no