Our Answer.

You erre, for want of a distinction of termes: for the word [mysticall signification] hath two acceptions; the one Sacramentall, by signification of grace conferred by God: the other is onely Morall, by signification of mans spirituall duty and obedience towards God. The Ceremonies, which we defend, are onely mystical-morall: but the signification of Ceremonies, which M. Caluin re∣proueth, is onely that Mysticall, which is properly Sacra∣mentall; as is euident in the place alledged, where he speaketh of Sacraments, [Quibus annexa est promissio gra∣tiae] Whereunto God hath annexed a promise of grace. And againe; Testantur de gratia Dei.

Zeppperus speaketh not a word of any mysticall signi∣fication at all.

B. Iewell insisteth onely in the Sacramentall, and hath not one word touching the morall; nor any Protestant author that I haue read (Beza onely excepted) hath spo∣ken absolutely against Signes Symbolicall, and meerly sig∣nificant. Yet Beza himselfe, I presume, will be found here∣after to allow them in some Cases. This distinction as it is pertinent, so is it also of some importance, and there∣fore ought to be diligently obserued; as will better ap∣peare in our Answer to their next obiection.