A defence of the innocencie of the three ceremonies of the Church of England viz. the surplice, crosse after baptisme, and kneeling at the receiuing of the blessed Sacrament. Diuided into two parts: in the former whereof the generall arguments vrged by the non-conformists; and, in the second part, their particular accusations, against these III. ceremonies seuerally, are answered, and refuted. Published by authoritie.

About this Item

Title
A defence of the innocencie of the three ceremonies of the Church of England viz. the surplice, crosse after baptisme, and kneeling at the receiuing of the blessed Sacrament. Diuided into two parts: in the former whereof the generall arguments vrged by the non-conformists; and, in the second part, their particular accusations, against these III. ceremonies seuerally, are answered, and refuted. Published by authoritie.
Author
Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659.
Publication
London :: Imprinted [by R. Field] for William Barret,
1618.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Church of England -- Customs and practices -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A07801.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A defence of the innocencie of the three ceremonies of the Church of England viz. the surplice, crosse after baptisme, and kneeling at the receiuing of the blessed Sacrament. Diuided into two parts: in the former whereof the generall arguments vrged by the non-conformists; and, in the second part, their particular accusations, against these III. ceremonies seuerally, are answered, and refuted. Published by authoritie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A07801.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 24, 2025.

Pages

SECT. XXI. Our last proofe is from the confession and practise of the Non-conformists themselues.

The Lyncolneshire Opposites, and euery Non-con∣formist require in all their bookes and writings to haue their Ceremonies so free, that euery Parish may vse such Rites, as by the discretion of the choycest Parishioners may be held most expedient: by vertue of which their conceipted freedome, it cometh to passe that Some Parishes will sit at the receiuing of the Communion; and some stand: Some will haue Godfathers and Godmothers, and witnesses; and some will be content onely with the na∣turall father: Some will admit of publike Festiuals and holy∣daies; and some of none. And all this varietie they are per∣swaded may be had in diuers Churches, without any variance at all. Which Circumstantiall points are so far to be accounted Ceremoniall, as they serue for a mo∣dification of our actions and gestures in the worship of God. Hence I may argue. If all these were of diuine au∣thoritie, then could they not be so diuerse; for the law of Gods word is to all Nations the same. But if they be of humaine institution, then are they in that respect either vnlawfull, or lawfull: if vnlawfull, then ought you not to vse the Ceremonies of mans ordinance; if lawfull, then you ought not to impugne them.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.