¶The .vi. Chapiter. ¶Of the vnsuertie of landes and possessions.
LAndes and possessions many men yet muche more esteme then money, because the landes seme not so casuall as money is or plate, for that though theyr other substaunce may be s••olne and taken away, yet euermore they thinke that theyr land wyll lye styll where it laye•• but what are we the better that our land can not be styrred but wyl lye s••yll where it laye, while our selfe maye be remoued & not suffered to come neare it? what great difference is there to vs, whither our substaūce be mouable or vn∣mouable, syth we be so mouable our selfe, yt we may be remoued frō them both, & lese thē both twaine•• sauing y• som•• time ••n ye money is the suertie somewhat more. For when we ••e fayne our selfe to ••••ee, we may make shifte to cary some of our money wt vs, where of our land we can not cary one inche. If our lād be a thing of more suertie than our•• money, howe happeth it than