The co[n]futacyon of Tyndales answere made by syr Thomas More knyght lorde chau[n]cellour of Englonde

About this Item

Title
The co[n]futacyon of Tyndales answere made by syr Thomas More knyght lorde chau[n]cellour of Englonde
Author
More, Thomas, Sir, Saint, 1478-1535.
Publication
Prentyd at London :: By wyllyam Rastell,
1532.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Tyndale, William, d. 1536. -- Answere unto Sir Thomas Mores dialoge -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Protestantism -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A07693.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The co[n]futacyon of Tyndales answere made by syr Thomas More knyght lorde chau[n]cellour of Englonde." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A07693.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

More

Here is a shorte sentence and a false erronyouse iudge∣ment gyuen by Tyndale, vppon all crystē people that haue [ B] ben aneyled synnys crystēdome fyrst began. And he is ledde therto by two specyall motyues / the tone foly, the tother falsshed. For of hys foly he rekeneth hym selfe sure euery thyng to be false that is not euydently wryten in holy scryp¦ture / whyche one thynge is the tone halfe of all the fals fun¦dacyon wheruppon Luther and Tyndale haue bylded all theyr heresyes. For vppon thys Tyndale sayth there is not any promyse of thys sacrament wryten in scrypture: erg there was no promyse made by god. whyche argument is so good, that euery boye in scolys laugheth it to scorne & well they may / for all the worlde can neuer make it good.

Hys other motyue is falsede, whyche is the antecedent of the same argument / that is to wyt that thys sacrament [ C] hath no promyse in scrypture. For it hath an expresse pro∣myse in the pystle of saynt Iamys / where he byddeth that yf any be syk,* 1.1 he shall induce the preestes to come and praye for hym and anoynte hym wyth oyle, & the prayour of ayth shall hele the syk man / and yf he be in synne they shall be for¦gyuen hym. Nay sayth Tyndale here we maye se that the aneylynge doth nothynge / for saynt Iamys sayth that the prayour of fayth shall hele the man. Thys is a sure argu∣ment. Lo, bycause saynt Iamys geueth the great effecte to the faythfull prayour: therfore the oyle doth nothynge at all. If it do nothynge at all towarde the remyssyon of syn∣nes: why wolde saynt Iamys haue it there, that myght sa∣uyng for the sacramēt as well be thens as there / except that Tyndale wene that saynt Iamys were so wyse in naturall

Page xlv

[ A] thynges, that he thought oyle a mete medycyne for euery sore.

Thys place in saynt Iamis dyd so preace vppō Luther / that he was fayne to say that the epystle was neuer of saynt Iamys makynge, nor nothynge had in it of any apostoly∣call spyryt / but he that so sayd was full of an apostatycall spyryte.

Of the sacrament of penauns.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.