Page 1265
A CHRONOLOGIE TO THE HISTO∣RIE OF T. LIVIVS, COMPILED ACCORDING TO THE TABLES AND RECORDS OF VERRIVS FLACCVS IN THE CAPITOLL, AND SET OUT VVITH MOST PROFITABLE notes, shewing the varietie and disagreement of Authors about the names of the Romane Consuls.
The causes of dissent and repugnance in Historiographers, as touching the compu∣tation and relating of the yeeres from the foundation of the citie of Rome.
SInce wee entend to setfoorth a Kalender or Register of the Consuls mentioned in the historie of Livius, which by reason of uncertein∣tie, obscuritie, and discordance of the times, is so darke and intri∣cate, that not onely the learned and most experienced Historians of our age, but the best writers of the Romane storie in auncient time estsoones complained thereof; we thinke it not impertinent to our purpose, briefely to search into the causes of this dissent: which beeing once knowne, wee may follow that account of the times, which seemeth to accord best with the historicall truth, and to be grounded upon the authoritie and testimonie of the most authenticall and approoved writers. For seeing that an historie (as Cicero hath most truly said) is the witnesse of times; what is more unfitting for it, than to misse and want that which is the chiefest point therein, and without due and diligent reckoning made, to be ignorant what was first and what was last done? It seemeth therefore, that of this diversitie in the account and com∣putation of the Romane Consuls, there be three especiall causes.
The first is, for that the yeere in which the first Consuls entred into that magistracie, is by the Romane Historiographers, not after one sort but diversly set downe. For Dionysius (a most di∣ligent writer of the acts of Romans) in his first booke, in the end of the fourth and beginning of the fifth, reporteth, that the KK. reigned 244 yeeres: which also is collected out of the yeerely computation gathered by Varro and approoved by the authoritie of others. For Messala repor∣teth, how upon the expulsion of the KK. which hapned in the 244 yeer after the foundation of the citie, the Romans were ruled under the yeerly government of Consuls. To which opinion Livie also subscribeth in the end of his first booke, saying, that the regiment of KK. continued 244 yeeres from the foundation of the citie, unto the freedome and libertie thereof. But Eutropius in his 1 booke writeth, that the seven Kings reigned in Rome 243 yeers: which account agreeth with Sex. Ruffus in his abridgement. In which varietie this is to be observed, that these two last named, reckon the yeeres onely of every kings raigne, and out of the whole and grosse summe leave out the yeere of the interreigne, which Dionysius, Livius, Messala, and the rest insert be∣tweene, and that right truly and upon good reason: for after the death of Romulus, the inter∣reigne continued one yeere. Consider then and examine the thing diligently, and yee shall find, that in reckoning the yeeres of every kings reigne in severall, Eutropius and Sextus Ruffus both, attribute as many yeeres to the kings government, as Denis, Livie, and the rest: so that this diffe∣rence is not much. But others there be (as Eusebius hath delivered in his Chronicles) who write, that the KK. reigned but 243 yeeres, and take the interregencie withall: whose judgement, Oro∣sius, Iornandes, and Bede seeme to follow. For Orosius in the 5. chap. of his second booke recor∣deth, that Brutus the Consull in that very yeere, namely the 244, put his owne sonnes to death.