The reasons of a pastors resolution, touching the reuerend receiuing of the holy communion: written by Dauid Lindesay, D. of Diuinitie, in the Vniuersitie of Saint Andrewes in Scotland, and preacher of the gospell at Dundy

About this Item

Title
The reasons of a pastors resolution, touching the reuerend receiuing of the holy communion: written by Dauid Lindesay, D. of Diuinitie, in the Vniuersitie of Saint Andrewes in Scotland, and preacher of the gospell at Dundy
Author
Lindsay, David, d. 1641?
Publication
London :: Printed by George Purslowe, for Ralph Rounthwaite, and are to be sold at his shop in Pauls Church-yard, at the signe of the Golden Lyon,
1619.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Church of Scotland -- Customs and practices -- Early works to 1800.
Lord's Supper -- Church of Scotland -- Early works to 1800.
Posture in worship -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A05533.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The reasons of a pastors resolution, touching the reuerend receiuing of the holy communion: written by Dauid Lindesay, D. of Diuinitie, in the Vniuersitie of Saint Andrewes in Scotland, and preacher of the gospell at Dundy." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A05533.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2024.

Pages

ARG. 8.

FInally, that this gesture cannot be necessarie, is manifest by this Rea∣son: There is no necessarie Ceremo∣nie, that either belongeth to the

Page 40

essence or perfection of this Sacra∣ment, but is set downe in the doc∣trine of the institution thereof, either by Paul, or the Euangelists. The forme set downe by Paul to the Co∣rinthians, who professeth that hee deliuered to them, that which hee had receiued of the Lord; and in another place affirmeth, that fidelity is the chiefe vertue required in the dispensers of the Gospell, and that his conscience did not accuse him that he had failed in that point: The forme (I say) set downe by him, containeth nothing concerning Ta∣ble-gesture. In Mathew, Marke, and Luke, if we would know certainely what things doe necessarily belong to the Sacrament, then wee must marke precisely where the doctrine of the Sacrament beginneth, and where it endeth. It is sure, that it beginneth not at these words, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, they being eating; not before, except we hold the order obserued

Page 41

by Christ to be necessary, videlicet, to be eating another supper before; but must beginne at these words, Iesus tooke Bread, and end with this com∣mandement, Doe this in remembrance of me. Betweene these two points the whole doctrine is set downe, and containeth no more, then Paul pro∣fessed to haue deliuered to the Corin∣thians. And so there is neither in the doctrine of Paul, nor in the doc∣trine of the Euangelists, so much as mention made of Lying, Sitting, Standing, or Kneeling; whereby it is euident, that none of these gestures and positions of body, are recom∣mended as necessary. But that this Ceremonie is left to be determined by the Church, as the Time, the Place, and the Order, are according to the rule of Charitie and Decencie.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.