The B. of Sarisburie.
Take heede, good Reader, M. Hardinge hath here throwen a great Miste of learninge, to da••••e thy sighte. Onlesse thou eye him wel, he wil steale from thee. Thus he frameth his Syllogismus. The lesse Asia beinge a principal parte of ye Greeke Churche, had then the Seruice in the Greeke tongue: But sundrie Coun∣tries of the same Asia vnderstoode not the Gréeke tongue: Ergo, they had their Seruice in an vnknowen tongue.
Here is a fayre glosse. But be not deceiued: M. Harding* 1.1 knoweth wel yenough, it is but a fallace, that is to saye, a deceiteful argument, named in the Schooles, Ex meris particularibus: or, A non distributo ad distributum. Onlesse he amende the Maior, and make it an vniuersal, and say thus, Al Asia the Lesse had the Seruice in the Greeke tongue, it can in no wise holde. That Asia the Lesse had the Ser∣uice in Greeke, it is doubted of no man, nor learned, nor vnlearned. But, that al Asia ye Lesse had throughout in al partes the same Seruice, if it be denied, M. Har∣dinge with al his learninge is not hable to proue it: and therefore he did better to tourne it ouer without any proufe at al.
The Minor is this, sundrie Nations in Asia the Lesse vnderstoode not the Greeke. And to prooue this, M. Hardinge hath directed al his drifte, But to what ende? for nei∣ther is it denied by any of vs, nor is it any parte of our question. And yet not with∣standinge, is not M. Hardinge hable to prooue it with al his gheasses.
He allegeth the Actes of the Apostles,* 1.2 where as mention is made of sundrie languages, and amonge the same certaine prouinces of this Asia specially named for their difference in speache. But what if answeare were made, That al there rehearsed were not diuerse tongues, but rather certaine differences in one tongue? Certainely Beda* 1.3 séemeth plainely so to say. His woordes be these: Verely this man was with him, for he is of Galilie: not for that the people of Galilie, and the people of Hie∣rusalem, vsed sundrie tongues: but for that euery prouince (of Iurie) hauinge a peculiar man∣ner of vtterance in their speache, coulde not avoide the same. And hereunto he applieth this storie of the Actes of the Apostles.
But saithe M. Hardinge, There must needes be greater difference betweene these Countries of Asia, and that, bicause of often ouerthrowes and conquestes, that there had happened. The con∣iecture is good. But the greatest Conquerours that came there, were the Mace∣donians, the Thebanes, and other Grecians, who no doubte, planted there the Greeke tongue, as it may soone appeare to any man, that can with iudgement con∣sider of it.* 1.4 S. Paule vnto the Ephesians, the Galathians, and the Collossians, dwellinge al in this same Asia the Lesse, wrote in Greeke. And S. Luke writinge of S. Paules beinge, and preachinge, at Ephesus saith, It came so to passe, Vt om∣nes, qui habitabant in Asia, audirent Sermonem Domini Iesu, Iudaei simul & Graeci: that al they, that dwelte in Asia, hearde the woorde of the Lorde Iesus, bothe Iewes, and Greekes.* 1.5 S. Luke that had trauailed ouer that whole Countrie with S. Paule, knewe none other Nation there but Iewes, and Greekes: Maister Hardinge hath a gheasse, there shoulde be some other Barbarous people also: but what they were, or where aboute they dwelte, or what tongue they spake, he can not tel. Uerely Polycarpus was Bishop of Smyrna: Gregorius was Bishop in Pontus: