M. Hardinges both togeather. The firste is, If a Prieste minister in One
Kinde, he committeth sacrilege. The seconde is, The Apostles were Priestes,
and ministred onely in One Kinde: for here is no manner mention of the Cuppe.
These bothe be M. Hardinges premisses. Hereof it must necessarily follow, and can
not be auoided, that the Apostles of Christe committed sacrilege. But what wil
not these menne graunte, to winne their purpose?
The weight of M. Hardinges argument, is taken, as they name it in Schooles,
ab Authoritate negatiuè: and onlesse it be in consideration of some other Circum∣stance,
it is so simple, that a very childe may soone answeare it. For as he saithe
here, There is no mention made but of Breakinge of Breade: Ergo, there was no Cuppe, So might
he also say, There is no mention made, but of Breakinge of Breade: Ergo, there was not Christes
Bodie. Or thus: Iacob went downe into Egypte with thrée score and tenne soules:
Ergo, in his companie he had no bodies. Certainely, as the soule in that place
importeth the whole man: euen so in the other place, the breakinge of Breade im∣porteth
the whole Ministration.
As for the Breakinge of Breade in the .27. of the Actes, whiche place as it is
auoutched, Chrysostome vnderstandeth of the Sacrament, verely M. Harding was
therein muche ouerséene. For the texte is cleare: If S. Paule gaue the Sacrament▪
beinge at that time in the shippe, he gaue it onely vnto Infidels, that knewe not
Christe. And Chrysostomes exposition euen in the same place is plaine to the
contrary. For thus he enlargeth S. Paules woordes, that he spake to the Mariners.
Obsecro vos vt sumatis cibum: hoc enim ad salutem vestram fuerit: hoc est, ne forsan fame
pereatis, cibum sumite. I pray you take some sustenance, It is behooueful for you that ye so
doo. That is to say, take some meate, leaste perhaps ye die for hunger. Now let M. Harding
either say, these woordes are spoken of ye Sacrament: or confesse, that he hath made
vntrue reporte of his Doctour.