A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.

About this Item

Title
A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Author
Jewel, John, 1522-1571.
Publication
Imprinted at London :: In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes,
Anno. 1565.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Harding, Thomas, 1516-1572. -- Answere to Maister Juelles chalenge.
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Catholic Church -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04474.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04474.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

M. Hardinge. The .3. Diuision.

Nothinge can be plainer to this purpose,* 1.1 then the saieinges of S. Ambrose. Licet Figura Panis, & Vini videatur,* 1.2 nihil tamen aliud, quam Caro Christi, & Sanguis, post Consecrationem credendum est. Although, saith he, the forme of Breade, and VVine be seene, yet after Consecration we must beleue, they are nothinge elles, but the Fleashe, and Bloude of Christe. After the opinion of this Father, the shewe and figure of Breade and VVine are seene, and therefore remaine after Con∣secration. And if we must beleue, that whiche was Breade, and VVine before, to be none other thinge, but the Fleashe and Bloude of Christe, then are they no other thinge in deede. For if they were, we might so beleue. For beleefe is grounded vpon trueth, and what so euer is not true, is not to be be∣leued. Hereof it foloweth, that after Consecration the accidentes, and shewes onely remaine with∣out the Substance of Breade and VVine.* 1.3 In an other place he saith as muche. Panis iste, &c. This Breade before the woordes of the Sacramentes, is Breade: as soone as the Consecration cometh, of Breade is made the Bodie of Christe. Againe in an other place he saith most plainely, That the power of Consecration is greater, then the Power of Nature: Bicause Nature is changed by Consecration. By this Father it is euident, that the Nature (178)* 1.4 that is to say, the Substance of Breade, and

Page 427

by Consecration beinge chaunged into the Bodie,* 1.5 and Bloude of Christe, theire natural qualities, whiche be accidentes, continewinge vnchanged for performance of the Sacrament, remaine with∣out the Substance of Breade and VVine.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.